Unofficial File parts/004659c.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Sticker  2.3 x  2.3 Round with Clock Face Pattern
0 Name: 004659c.dat
0 Author: Alex Taylor [anathema]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !KEYWORDS set 590

Status:
Needs more votes. (N)
Size: 431 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=novote
anathema=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Sun Aug 4 16:45:01 2019, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: anathema
At Fri Aug 9 17:55:01 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: anathema
At Sat Aug 24 12:05:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
The description doesn't match the size of the design. 2 => 2.4 brick

Based on this picture:
https://www.bricklink.com/PL/BA66pb01.jpg?0
I think it should be 2.2 brick, or 44 ldu, in diameter.

At Sat Aug 24 13:00:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: anathema
Certification: novote
Comments:
The size is accurate; it's based on a high-res scan I did of the original sticker-sheet.

At Mon Aug 26 12:00:01 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: anathema
Comments:
Corrected name.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Mon Aug 26 21:15:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
The design doesn't match the description, and I think the description is correct. This has a diameter of 2.2 brick.

At Tue Aug 27 11:00:01 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: anathema
Comments:
As I said, this was based on a high-res (640dpi) scan of an original sticker-sheet. The diameter of the sticker is just over 18mm, which equates to ~46LDU. I've corrected the scale very slightly as I had it at 48LDU originally, and updated the title to be 2.3x2.3.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Aug 27 16:00:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
OK, this is better.
Based on this image alone, it is definitely not 48 ldu.
https://www.bricklink.com/PL/BA66pb01.jpg?0
I calc 18 mm to 45 ldu which gives a radius 22.5 ldu.

Is it correct to have the texmap image larger than the sticker?

I'm sorry, but I noticed today that you are using the cylc2 primitive. That one should not be used as a backside on stickers.
You have to use cylc3 instead, a primitive with condlines on the curved surface and no edges.
But it looks like we are missing a hi-res 4-4cylc3 primitive. Please use a disc+cyli

At Tue Aug 27 17:10:01 2019, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: anathema
Comments:
Oops - I thought I had used a cylc3! Fixed. The hi-res one does exist, incidentally.

The sticker is >18mm, hence a radius of 23LDU. I've set the texmap fractionally larger than the part deliberately - when I cleaned up the scan, I made the border slightly thicker than in the original sticker in order to conceal rough edges.

Regarding that BL image...I wouldn't read too much into it. There were two different sticker-sheets for set 590 and a different sheet again for set 374, which also uses this sticker. It's entirely plausible that the die-cut for each of the three sheets was a slightly different diameter. When I pull my copy of 374 out of storage I will check the diameter of its clock sticker so I can do the LDraw part for it.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Tue Aug 27 21:45:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I still get the version with a cylc3.
Are you editing with LDDP and close without saving?

At Wed Aug 28 06:10:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: anathema
Certification: novote
Comments:
The current version of the part has a cylc3. If you're seeing something different then it's your browser cacheing things.