Unofficial File p/stug15-2x2.dat
part image
File Header:
0 Stud Group For Round  2 x  2 Parts with Flattened Studs
0 Name: stug15-2x2.dat
0 Author: Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Primitive
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 // activate next lines to add logos on studs
0 // 1 16 10 -4 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 logo5.dat
0 // 1 16 -10 -4 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 logo5.dat
0 // 1 16 -10 -4 -10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 logo5.dat
0 // 1 16 10 -4 -10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 logo5.dat

Status:
Needs more votes. (X)
Size: 674 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Holly-Wood=novote
MagFors=novote
Steffen=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) subfiles:
~Brick 2 x 2 Round Type 2 without Outer Surface
Status: 2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSX)
File reviews and updates:
At Fri Mar 30 15:25:00 2018, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
At Fri Mar 30 17:05:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
The current title
"Stud Group For Round 2 x 2 Parts with Flattened Studs"
lets me somehow associate that the TOP of the studs is modified.

I would better like/understand the title:
"Stud Group 2 x 2 with Laterally Cut Studs for Round Parts"

What do others think?

At Fri Mar 30 17:20:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
If anything, I think we should describe the difference between stug15-2x2 and stug10-2x2.
They are both adapted to a round brick 2x2, but stug15 has flat side surfaces,
while stug10 has rounded surfaces, adapted to a diameter 40 ldu circle.

At Sat Jun 8 19:30:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: novote
Comments:
I agree with Steffen. When I read the title I thought about studs that were flattened at the top.

At Sun Jun 9 09:15:01 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: novote
Comments:
stud15 uses "Moderately truncated solid stud"

At Sun Jun 9 09:30:02 2019, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
that is incomprehensible to me as well.

For me the word "laterally" is important, see my suggestion above.