|
|
Unofficial File parts/x994.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
Download |
Review |
Edit |
CA Header Edit |
Events
File Header:
0 ~Electric Cable 3LDU Twin End for Plug Twin
0 Name: x994.dat
0 Author: Michael Heidemann [mikeheide]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Subpart
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CW
0 !HISTORY 2004-12-21 [mikeheide] initial version
0 !HISTORY 2011-12-16 [Steffen] adjusted to modified origin of x993.dat
Status:
 Certified! (ACCCX)
Size: 843 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=certify
MagFors=certify
cwdee=certify
mikeheide=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) files:
File reviews and updates:
At Tue Dec 21 22:54:04 2004, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
======================================================================
At Tue Dec 21 23:00:03 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
resubmit for redraw
======================================================================
At Wed Dec 22 20:04:02 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
changed title and date format
======================================================================
At Mon Jan 5 16:24:14 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
strange filename, sorry
also some MLCad comment relict "Unofficial Model"
is present in the header
======================================================================
At Mon Jan 5 17:06:19 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
part name needs some cleanup, too
======================================================================
At Sat Jan 31 18:26:21 2009 part 'parts/xwireend.dat' was renamed to 'parts/x994.dat'.
======================================================================
At Sat Jan 31 20:34:01 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
thanks for renaming; whitespace still missing in part name
======================================================================
At Mon Feb 2 01:04:02 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
still contains a reference to xwire.dat
(which cannot be downloaded anymore from PT,
probably due to an inconsistency on it :-()
======================================================================
At Mon Feb 2 01:06:10 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
- history entry in header lacks prefix
- part name should be polished
(see systematics at http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/x567c01.dat)
======================================================================
At Mon Feb 2 02:04:02 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
downgrading to novote
======================================================================
At Fri May 1 10:22:08 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
Comments:
admin, please add a space to part name on release
======================================================================
At Tue Jan 5 21:12:47 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I'm not sure anymore that this is correct being a part.
I think it should become a subpart instead.
======================================================================
At Wed Jan 6 09:18:28 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
Please remember discussion about such parts on other parts. They are needed to build another flexible part, so the has to be visible in some way to the user. Thats why we have pushed some of the to parts.
I strongly recommend this to be a part.
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 29 17:15:07 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
header contains invalid line
0 Unofficial Model
======================================================================
At Sat Jul 2 17:05:07 2011, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
fixed header
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sat Jul 2 17:10:06 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I had not been talking about the location (PARTS) of this file,
but of the type stated in the header.
While doing the previous correction, I took the opportunity
to set it to subpart. This way software can correctly avoid
putting gaps around this part when rendering.
I understand your reasons why this should not sit in the subparts
folder, but I think that this is only a workaround for the currently
existing software which normally does not show subparts in their parts list. Would we have an opportunity to label some subparts specially,
so they show up in a user GUI, then we would be able to put them
normally in the subparts folder.
======================================================================
At Fri Dec 16 03:20:05 2011, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
adjusted to modified origin of x993.dat
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Fri Dec 16 21:15:04 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
ERROR Filename for subparts has to start with 's\'. HOLD
x993.dat "~Electric Twin Cable Segment, 3LDU Diameter"
x994.dat "~Electric Twin Cable End Segment diam.3LDU"
Please adjust the names to a better likeness.
======================================================================
At Tue Dec 20 22:30:05 2011, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
Retitled as requested at
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/x993.dat
, see also
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/x994.dat
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/u9136.dat
for matching parts.
The discussion whether files like this should go into
- PARTS
- PARTS\S
- P
has been led over years now without fruitful result.
Here are the various opinions:
(1) PARTS:
Some people would like to see such files there,
because they this way can be seen in tools element selection GUI,
e.g. MLCad. Would the file sit in PARTS\S or P this would not be the case.
(2) PARTS\S:
Some people argument that this in fact is logically a subfile.
(3) P:
Thinking even more generic, this actually is a primitive.
My personal opinion is (3), because this would be the cleanest
structure in our library. We should IMHO not choose (1)
just because some existing tools cannot show parts from P.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Tue May 1 02:05:03 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
retitled
======================================================================
At Tue May 1 11:35:03 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
restored ~ prefix
======================================================================
At Fri Mar 15 17:50:09 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Mon Mar 18 22:15:04 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
There are two gaps, where the intersected tori meet x993.dat
======================================================================
At Tue Mar 19 16:50:04 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
Your are right! Good eye. But I have no idea how we should fix this issue here.
======================================================================
At Tue Mar 26 16:05:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
What's about adding two triangles there?
======================================================================
At Thu Mar 28 15:05:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
That was also my first suggestion, but also the most worse solution :)
I think I go with that triangles as they fill at least the gaps.
======================================================================
At Thu Mar 28 15:35:01 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
added two tiny triangles.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Thu Mar 28 16:40:02 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
Keep in mind that this is such a small surfaces that most of the users will never see this ;-)
======================================================================
At Thu Mar 28 17:30:05 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
Why holding this time??
======================================================================
At Fri Mar 29 23:05:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
?? triangles are added !!
======================================================================
At Fri Mar 29 23:20:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
Comments:
I'm sorry.
I had loaded this part into the browser and did something else. So my second hold comment got out without recognising your update.
Thanks for adding the triangles.
======================================================================
At Sat Mar 30 07:55:01 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Fri Apr 5 21:40:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Fri Jun 14 19:40:08 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
|
1 subfile isn't certified. (SX)
Needs more votes. (CX)