Unofficial File parts/x223.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

File Header:

0 Technic Rubber Belt (open file for usage guide)
0 Name: x223.dat
0 Author: Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
0 Un-Official Element
0 HINT Open file for usage guide
0 Parts x224 to x228 are meant to create rubberbelts taught around pulleys
0 when using LeoCad which doesn't allow to use directly Ldraw primitives
0 (users of MLcad should use Rubber Belt Generator, get it at
0 http://www.philohome.com/rubberbelt/rubberbelts.htm).
0 There are DAT-files for 5 fragments of rubber belt which combined, 
0 eventually overlapped, can be adapted to cover most situations:
0 - x227.dat ~Technic Rubber Belt element R9:
0               1/4 turn around Technic Bush 1/2
0 - x224.dat ~Technic Rubber Belt element R13:
0               1/4 turn around Technic Micromotor Pulley
0 - x225.dat ~Technic Rubber Belt element R30.5:
0               1/4 turn around Technic Wedge Belt Wheel
0 - x226.dat ~Technic Rubber Belt element R47:
0               1/4 turn around Technic Pulley Large
0 - x228.dat ~Technic Rubber Belt straight:
0               1 straight element 1 stud wide.
0 These elements have a square section to be correctly viewed in LeoCad which
0 doesn't show type 5 lines.

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

Status:
1 'hold' vote. (CCHSSSX)
Size: 2014 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

OrionP=certify
Steffen=hold
lar=certify

Required (unofficial) subfiles:

parts/x225.dat	~Technic Rubber Belt element R30.5	1 'hold' vote. (CCHX)	Events
parts/x227.dat	~Technic Rubber Belt element R9	1 'hold' vote. (CCHX)	Events
parts/x228.dat	~Technic Rubber Belt straight	1 'hold' vote. (CCHX)	Events

Related (unofficial) files:
(none)

File reviews and updates:

At Mon Jul 1 19:16:04 2002, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
======================================================================
At Sun Jul 7 23:50:08 2002, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: OrionP
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Sun Aug 25 04:52:04 2002, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: lar
Certification: hold
Comments:
Um, why are we going to have two versions of the same parts to cope with tools differences? Shouldn't there be one kind and the tools need to follow standard conventions?

Hold placed just for that reason. The parts themselves seem pretty slick and well thought out, hats off to the author for the hard work.

======================================================================
At Wed Oct 6 23:38:02 2004, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: lar
Certification: certify
Comments:
Per discussion offline with Steve Bliss I am not going to hold this any more. While I don't necessarily agree with the philosophy of how the parts are organised it probably ought not to be held on account merely of that.

======================================================================
At Wed Oct 27 21:28:04 2004, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
comments should be prefixed with //

======================================================================
At Tue Nov 9 19:30:04 2010, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
header is malformed

======================================================================
At Sat Jul 30 11:50:03 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
this should become a "formed" part -> c01 filename