Unofficial File parts/u9244.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

File Header:

0 Rock  4 x  4 x  1.333 Top [72/16]
0 Name: u9244.dat
0 Author: Steffen [Steffen]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

Status:
2 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSX)
Size: 298 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

MagFors=certify
Philo=certify
mikeheide=novote

Required (unofficial) subfiles:

parts/s/53933s01.dat	~Rock 4 x 4 x 1.333 Top Bicoloured, Colour 1	Needs admin review. (CCX)	Events
parts/s/53933s02.dat	~Rock 4 x 4 x 1.333 Top Bicoloured, Colour 2	Needs admin review. (CCX)	Events

Related (unofficial) files:

parts/u9243c01.dat

Rock 4 x 4 x 3 [72/16]

2 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSX)

Events

File reviews and updates:

At Sun Oct 28 09:30:05 2012, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
For all printed parts, our library includes an unprinted version.
That's a Good Thing (TM) IMHO, because that'll allow users to freely
use the unpatterned version. They can project other patterns on it
in 3D software, or use it as a basis for creating new patterns.
For colored bricks, we also provide color 16 version, so users can colorize them as wanted.

We should do the same for double-injection moulds like this bicolored
rock IMHO. Thus I'm providing this plain color 16 version here.

======================================================================
At Sun Oct 28 09:40:05 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
Comments:
Great to see this pieces now!

======================================================================
At Sun Oct 28 09:40:06 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
I'm sorry, this is a duplicate of official 30293.dat now :-(

I should have seen that before.

Question is if the color 16 version should use the new subparts
of the bicolored-rock, or if it should stay as it is now, i.e.
as a duplicated 3D modeling.

======================================================================
At Sun Oct 28 09:40:06 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
Please explain the difference between this and 30293.dat

======================================================================
At Sun Oct 28 09:50:07 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
I would not change anything. Part authors have to care about their work and I am sure they will find a way to do their work!
both files (u9244.dat and u9243.dat) should be deleted. IMHO.

======================================================================
At Sun Oct 28 09:55:04 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
converted this into a color 16 version of the bicolored rock

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sun Oct 28 16:25:08 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Mon Oct 29 12:25:05 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Tue Oct 30 18:15:05 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
I don't like mentioning the color as numbers. Therefore I can not certify.