Unofficial File parts/u9243.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

File Header:

0 Rock  4 x  4 x  1.667 Bottom [72/16]
0 Name: u9243.dat
0 Author: Steffen [Steffen]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

Status:
Needs more votes. (CX)
Size: 301 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

MMR1988=novote
MagFors=certify
Philo=novote
Steffen=novote
anathema=novote
mikeheide=novote

Required (unofficial) subfiles:

parts/s/53934s01.dat	~Rock 4 x 4 x 1.667 Bottom Bicoloured, Colour 1	Certified! (ACCX)	Events
parts/s/53934s02.dat	~Rock 4 x 4 x 1.667 Bottom Bicoloured, Colour 2	Certified! (ACCX)	Events

Related (unofficial) files:

parts/u9243c01.dat

Rock 4 x 4 x 3 [72/16]

2 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSX)

Events

File reviews and updates:

At Sun Oct 28 09:30:04 2012, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
For all printed parts, our library includes an unprinted version.
That's a Good Thing (TM) IMHO, because that'll allow users to freely
use the unpatterned version. They can project other patterns on it
in 3D software, or use it as a basis for creating new patterns.
For colored bricks, we also provide color 16 version, so users can colorize them as wanted.

We should do the same for double-injection moulds like this bicolored
rock IMHO. Thus I'm providing this plain color 16 version here.

======================================================================
At Sun Oct 28 09:40:06 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
Great to see this pieces now!

======================================================================
At Sun Oct 28 09:40:06 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
I'm sorry, this is a duplicate of official 30294.dat now :-(

I should have seen that before.

Question is if the color 16 version should use the new subparts
of the bicolored-rock, or if it should stay as it is now, i.e.
as a duplicated 3D modeling.

======================================================================
At Sun Oct 28 09:45:04 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
What is the difference between this and 30294?

======================================================================
At Sun Oct 28 09:55:03 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
converted this into a color 16 version of the bicolored rock

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sun Oct 28 16:25:07 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Mon Oct 29 12:25:06 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Mon Oct 29 13:25:01 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: anathema
Certification: novote
Comments:
Aren't the [...] tags for Physical_Colour shortcuts only?

This is similar to a patterned element, so shouldn't we specify the names of the fixed colour(s) in the title instead?


======================================================================
At Mon Oct 29 14:15:04 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I tend to agree with Alex...

======================================================================
At Mon Oct 29 19:10:04 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
For me this piece does not make sense in any way!

======================================================================
At Tue Oct 30 00:15:02 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
why not? it puts the "color 16" principle to this rock.
you can now let your LEGO miners dig different kinds of rock.
model your own crystals as you like them.
the color 16 usage is one of the key principles in the ldraw library IMHO.

======================================================================
At Tue Oct 30 18:10:06 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
I think you are right Steffen :)
But I don't like mentioning the color as numbers. Therefore I can not certify.

======================================================================
At Tue Oct 30 19:05:02 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: anathema
Certification: novote
Comments:
"Rock 4 x 4 x 1.667 Bottom with Dark_Bluish_Gray Upper" ?

======================================================================
At Wed Oct 31 17:25:02 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
I like that much more! Thanks for that suggestion.

======================================================================
At Fri Mar 15 19:15:05 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
"Dark_Bluish_Gray Upper" seems to me wrong, as the colored section is at the bottom of this piece.

======================================================================
At Sat Mar 16 06:25:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
what's about: with "...DBG Bottom"?
(of course you can write the long version of the colour name)

======================================================================
At Sun Mar 24 15:25:15 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
New appraviations should not go into the library nowadays.