Unofficial File parts/u9068.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | View Diff | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

File Header:

0 Rack Winder  2 x  4 x  2 Axle
0 Name: u9068.dat
0 Author: John VanZwieten [jvan]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 2007-10-14 [Philo] BFCed, used tooth8.dat, added missing lines
0 !HISTORY 2012-11-04 [PTadmin] Renamed from 200 to allow origin correction
0 !HISTORY 2012-11-05 [Philo] Simplified, changed origin, used noclip to prevent BFC errors
0 !HISTORY 2013-01-11 [MMR1988] Complete rework

Status:
Certified! (ACCCF)
Size: 3572 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

MMR1988=novote
MagFors=certify
Philo=certify
Steffen=certify
anathema=novote
cwdee=certify

Required (unofficial) subfiles:

parts/s/u9068s01.dat

~Rack Winder Axle Tooth

Certified! (ACCX)

Events

Related (unofficial) files:

parts/2426c02.dat

Rack Winder 2 x 4 x 2 with Black Axle

Certified! (ACCX)

Events

File reviews and updates:

At Thu Jan 17 22:35:02 2013, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 20 22:45:16 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Sun Jan 20 23:10:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: anathema
Certification: novote
Comments:
The title should start with a ~ as this is normally part of a pre-assembled element.

======================================================================
At Mon Jan 21 06:00:05 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
I think, this part shouldn't, because the user maybe wants to rotate it.

======================================================================
At Mon Jan 21 07:45:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
I think, this part shouldn't, because the user maybe wants to rotate it.

======================================================================
At Mon Jan 21 08:15:05 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Agreed. There is presently a shortcut without the geard axle (a good thing since this is the fixed assembly), maybe there should be one too including it?

======================================================================
At Mon Jan 21 21:40:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
@Philo: You agree - but to what? add ~ or not?

======================================================================
At Mon Jan 21 23:25:01 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
intuitively, I would expect a leading ~ here

======================================================================
At Tue Jan 22 08:05:01 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
I disagree. This part should not have a ~.

Any part that a builder would want to position in his model, should be "foundable".
Philo has allways made the power function engines like that.
One file containing the complete casing, and the movable axle visible, without the ~.

Hide all the "subparts" in the static assembly with a ~.
Leave the moving "subparts" easy to find, without a ~.

But you must also provide a complete, static assembly, to be used in build intructions or partlists.
At the moment we are missing one file: 2426c02.dat "Rack Winder 2 x 4 x 2 with Axle".


======================================================================
At Tue Jan 22 09:35:01 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Completely agree with Magnus. I summarized this here: http://forums.ldraw.org/read.php?19,7848,7848#msg-7848

======================================================================
At Tue Jan 22 11:30:16 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: anathema
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes, that seems reasonable to me :-)

======================================================================
At Fri Mar 22 07:30:05 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Sat Mar 23 13:55:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.