|
|
Unofficial File parts/u9064.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
Download |
Review |
Edit |
CA Header Edit |
Events
File Header:
0 ~Electric Spybotic Fake PCB
0 Name: u9064.dat
0 Author: Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 // Fake inner electronics details for see-through
Status:
 Certified! (ACCX)
Size: 10401 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=novote
MagFors=novote
Philo=novote
Steffen=certify
cwdee=certify
mikeheide=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) files:
File reviews and updates:
At Sun Jun 8 17:15:44 2008, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
======================================================================
At Wed Sep 30 20:30:17 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Holly-Wood
Certification: hold
Comments:
39 is a MLCad color not a LDraw color:
1 39 -44 -32.365 -92 6 0 0 0 -12 0 0 0 6 4-4cyli.dat
1 39 -44 -32.365 -92 6 0 0 0 -12 0 0 0 6 4-4edge.dat
1 39 -44 -32.365 -92 6 0 0 0 -12 0 0 0 6 4-4disc.dat
1 39 -44.001 -44.366 -92 -6 0 0 0 -6 0 0 0 6 4-8sphe.dat
======================================================================
At Fri Oct 2 09:00:47 2009, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Corrected color, header and duplicated lines
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Fri Oct 2 19:06:17 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: certify
Comments:
None of the more usual subparts. :-)
======================================================================
At Sun Jul 4 11:40:15 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
BFC errors because of missing surfaces at the side boxes and at the top of the cylinder. Also at the triangle interface connector.
======================================================================
At Sun Jul 4 12:15:10 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
As a subpart it doesn't need to be BFC-tight...
======================================================================
At Sun Jul 4 13:50:05 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
Comments:
You are right, but I thought this is so different from other subparts.
======================================================================
At Sun Dec 11 12:50:11 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
the metal parts currently use color 383 (lacquered plastic).
according to color table at
http://forums.ldraw.org/read.php?19,214,323#msg-323
, they better should be modeled as real metal (494).
While being at it, I suggest that the BFC holes simply be closed
by adding the handful of missing faces.
======================================================================
At Sun Dec 11 12:50:11 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
additionally, I suggest to relocate this file from \s to be a ~part
instead.
I do this because file 22579.dat does so.
This one does not match that systematics.
======================================================================
At Sun Dec 11 13:10:08 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
(keeping hold)
Closing the large vertical rods at their tops
will break the current LED implementation (see parent files)...
Maybe moving the reflective portion of the LEDs to here
would solve the issue.
The other files then can add the colored LED tops.
======================================================================
At Fri Aug 24 07:40:03 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Changed silver color, unBFCed the cylinders.
Could indeed be promoted to uxxxx part...
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sat Aug 25 17:15:40 2012 part 'parts/s/43560s01.dat' was renamed to 'parts/u9064.dat'.
======================================================================
At Sun Aug 26 23:40:03 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
this cylinder
1 4 0 -68 61.365 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 -3 0 2-4cyli.dat
is too long. it overlaps with this one
1 47 0 -68 58.365 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 12 0 4-4cyli.dat
, and both have different BFC orientation.
This causes flickering when this part is viewed in LDView
in BFC checking mode.
======================================================================
At Mon Aug 27 06:50:14 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Corrected, for what it is worth...
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Tue Aug 28 20:30:06 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Sat Sep 1 15:05:01 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Header says Subpart, but this is a Part. Right?
And the silver parts are back to colour 383.
======================================================================
At Sat Sep 1 17:05:02 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Changed type to part and corrected color again...
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sun Oct 14 22:35:03 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Sat Dec 29 21:10:18 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Sat Dec 29 21:45:39 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
ugh, I was too quick.
I still think that this file should become self-contained.
Currently, the tops of the LEDs are located inside 40575.dat.
I think those tops should be relocated from there to here.
======================================================================
At Sat Dec 29 22:35:03 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Please do it if you feel like!!!!
======================================================================
At Sat Dec 29 23:25:02 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
did that change, updated subfile s\40575s01.dat
(which has sneaked out accidentially with some parts update)
sent to Chris
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 6 17:45:04 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
The yellow LED is missing. (See 40575.dat)
======================================================================
At Mon Apr 1 02:05:05 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
moved yellow LED from 40575.dat to u9064.dat
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Mon Apr 1 08:10:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Mon Apr 1 10:35:09 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
There are to many edges when using this box type:
1 4 -40 -16.5 0 0 14 0 0 0 6.5 -35 0 0 box4-4a.dat
======================================================================
At Mon Apr 1 11:20:04 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Is this really a problem ???
======================================================================
At Mon Apr 1 14:10:05 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
this part is very complex and sitting hrre now for so long, I suggest to let it out for now and - if wanted - improve it in a later iteration...
======================================================================
At Mon Apr 1 17:10:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
I agree that this is good to release as it is.
======================================================================
At Mon Apr 1 17:50:09 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
OK, I will remove my hold. But I don't feel, that I can certify this part as it is now.
======================================================================
At Mon Apr 1 20:15:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
Comments:
so let's have this go the first time,
perfectization can be done (if wanted) in a next iteration
======================================================================
At Tue Apr 2 18:10:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
While working on correcting the differently used silver colours, I still don't know what colour should be used in all the LED's.
This part now uses 494 on all the electric contact metal parts, and 383 in all the LED's.
Is that correct? I think so, and want to leave all other LED as they are.
383 is more reflective than 494 and that is good in a LED. It is suppossed to mimic a light source. Any comments?
======================================================================
At Tue Apr 2 18:35:02 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes, I used chrome color precisely for its shininess.
======================================================================
At Wed Apr 3 05:00:15 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
|
1 subfile isn't certified. (CCSX)