Unofficial File parts/u8008b.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

File Header:

0 Mursten Brick  2 x 14 with 1 Slot
0 Name: u8008b.dat
0 Author: J.C. Tchang [tchang]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CW

0 !CATEGORY Brick
0 !KEYWORDS Automatic Binding Brick, Lego Mursten

Status:
Needs more votes. (CX)
Size: 2087 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

Philo=novote
Steffen=novote
mikeheide=certify
simlego=novote

Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)

Related (unofficial) files:
(none)

File reviews and updates:

At Wed Jan 16 02:24:09 2008, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: tchang
======================================================================
At Mon May 25 19:18:13 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
I don't think the current part number 700m24b.dat is okay.
700.dat is "Brick 10x20", and has nothing to do with this one.
This also introduces a strange sequence of:
- 3 digits
- letter "m"
- 2 digits
- letter "b".
I'd like to have this part moved to some x....dat filename
instead of using the current one.

======================================================================
At Mon May 25 19:22:05 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
I meant "700m28b.dat" above, of course

======================================================================
At Tue Apr 6 13:20:12 2010, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: simlego
Certification: hold
Comments:
The use of stud.dat is doubtable, since my part has no logo on studs. For me it's alright to rename it to x717 as I already have reserved that part number for this part.
http://news.lugnet.com/cad/dat/parts/?n=5007
My suggested description: Brick 2 x 14 with Window Cutout


======================================================================
At Tue Apr 6 13:35:11 2010, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Agreed, the stud could be replaced with a cylc properly scaled.

======================================================================
At Tue Apr 6 16:45:46 2010, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: simlego
Certification: novote
Comments:
I agree with Philo. But since I don't know the reasoning behind the naming conventions for Mursten parts (had no idea there are currently 52 of them in the PT!), and don't know if the stud issue is enough for a hold vote, I change to novote.

======================================================================
At Tue Apr 6 21:05:11 2010, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
I just came across these pages. I would like to say the naming is not that bad, but did not fit in our current system!
http://www.legos.tabacaria.com.pt/Pt2/txtBk/55a.htm

======================================================================
At Tue Apr 6 21:40:04 2010, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
(keeping hold)


As offline discussed via e-mail, I favor the creation
of a dedicated Mursten Stud (without logo) over using 4-4cyli here.
Reason: imagine some future software which concludes
part connectivity from stud primitives usage.


======================================================================
At Tue Apr 6 21:45:03 2010, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: simlego
Certification: hold
Comments:
As a result of the discussion, I agree with Steffen.

======================================================================
At Thu May 10 07:38:42 2012 part 'parts/700m28b.dat' was renamed to 'parts/u8008b.dat'.
======================================================================
At Fri May 11 00:20:02 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
removing hold

======================================================================
At Fri May 11 11:35:02 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: simlego
Certification: novote
Comments:
removing hold

======================================================================
At Sat May 12 05:35:01 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.