Parts Tracker :: Parts List :: Activity :: Submit :: PT Tools :: PT Reference :: LDraw Specifications :: Lookup

Unofficial File parts/s/85582s01.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

part image

File Header:

0 ~Technic Bionicle Thornax Fruit 1/8
0 Name: s\85582s01.dat
0 Author: Santeri Piippo [arezey]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Subpart
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 2013-08-14 {LEGO Digital Designer} Original part shape
0 !HISTORY 2014-04-19 [arezey] File preparation for LDraw Parts Tracker

Status:
Needs more votes. (X)
Size: 14571 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

MMR1988=novote
MagFors=novote
Philo=novote
arezey=novote

Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)

Related (unofficial) files:

parts/85582.dat

Technic Bionicle Thornax Fruit

2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSX)

Events

parts/85582p01.dat

Technic Bionicle Thornax Fruit with Black Band

2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSX)

Events

File reviews and updates:

At Fri Apr 18 23:45:04 2014, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: arezey
======================================================================
At Thu Apr 24 22:45:04 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
IMO, this area should be flipped to avoid concave surface:
3 5 6.869 12.349 11.897 6.834 12.243 12.079 22.97 25.603 22.978
3 5 6.834 12.243 12.079 21.978 24.743 24.82 22.97 25.603 22.978
It forces a cond-line to behave badly.

======================================================================
At Sun Jun 1 08:05:04 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:

Upgrading to hold. That area should be corrected.

======================================================================
At Sun Jun 1 09:05:53 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: arezey
Comments:
I'll one-up that: rebuilt the thorn

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sun Jun 1 10:05:03 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:

Much better, but are all cond-lines necessary?
IMO, there's no need for cond-lines across flat ares.

======================================================================
At Sun Jun 1 10:15:02 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
As long as this part is only available in solid colours, I would model it much simpler...
Just a bleed through cone and then some edges around...
anyway.
I'll do a detailed check later.

======================================================================
At Sun Jun 1 10:35:03 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
> Much better, but are all cond-lines necessary?
> IMO, there's no need for cond-lines across flat ares.
They seem to make a difference for smooth-shading algorithms... I added one condline to s02 that was also across a flat (or at least almost-flat) surface and the render improved considerably.

> As long as this part is only available in solid colours, I would model it much simpler...
> Just a bleed through cone and then some edges around...
anyway.
I would've done it simpler as well but I already got complaints about bleed-ins like that on one of the shield parts so I figure we don't do that anymore. I don't really agree with it but meh. Quite late to change now anyway.

======================================================================
At Sun Jun 1 12:40:04 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
>>I would've done it simpler as well but I already got complaints about bleed-ins like that on one of the shield parts so I figure we don't do that anymore. I don't really agree with it but meh.
Yes, sometimes it is strange, what happens here. :-) Seems, that I fully missed this part.

>>Quite late to change now anyway.

Yes indeed.
I still haven't found the time for a complete review... :-(

======================================================================
At Mon Jun 2 16:55:40 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:

You shouldn't add more to the file than what is really needed.
Adding more cond-lines across a flat surface, to get better renderings in one program (LDView?), is not god practice.

======================================================================
At Mon Jun 2 18:45:05 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
"I already got complaints about bleed-ins like that on one of the shield parts so I figure we don't do that anymore."
Not by me. Here is a case where "hiding dust under carpet" would give better results... this should imho be done from a cone slightly penetrating a 1-8sphe primitive. Not only it would behave better with primitive substitution, but it would display fine with everything. Maybe even the spike end should be done with a flattened half sphere?


© 2001-2014 LDraw.org, see Legal Info for details. This website is powered by Peeron.com.

LEGO® is a registered trademark of the LEGO Group, which does not sponsor, endorse, or authorize this site. Visit the official Lego website at http://www.lego.com/.
The LDraw system is a completely unofficial, community run free CAD system which represents official parts produced by the LEGO company.
The LDraw Parts Tracker is maintained and developed by voluntary members of the LDraw organisation.