|
|
Unofficial File parts/s/6377s01.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
Download |
Review |
Edit |
CA Header Edit |
Events
File Header:
0 ~Duplo Train Track Straight 4 x 8 (Half)
0 Name: s\6377s01.dat
0 Author: Michael Heidemann [mikeheide]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Subpart
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !CATEGORY Train
0 !HISTORY 2005-04-16 [mikeheide] initial version
0 !HISTORY 2013-01-10 [MMR1988] BFC'ed, add license, replace of quads by boxes and rects, rewrite some ares
0 // half of big sleeper
Status:
2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSX)
Size: 16882 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=novote
MagFors=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) files:
File reviews and updates:
At Sat Apr 16 22:10:03 2005, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
======================================================================
At Sat Apr 17 09:30:09 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
suggest BFCing
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 29 17:10:03 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
header contains invalid line
0 Unofficial Model
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 6 20:15:18 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
increasing to hold
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 6 23:10:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
I got the permission in another file to change this one, too. So let's go...
======================================================================
At Tue Jan 8 19:15:03 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
abolished use of 6377s02.dat, replaced it by direct use of tri4.dat
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Tue Jan 8 19:20:02 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
should get BFCed
======================================================================
At Tue Jan 8 19:40:06 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
I do my best to get it out until friday.
I try to replace the quads by rects and boxes...
======================================================================
At Wed Jan 9 23:30:11 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
Here it is. See history entry for happened changes.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Fri Jan 11 13:45:04 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
I found a small gap - corrected.
======================================================================
At Fri Jan 11 15:40:05 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
Comments:
Looks great!
======================================================================
At Fri Jan 11 21:40:05 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
Sorry, I found an overlapping quad
(and a stupid comment-line)
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Fri Jan 11 21:40:05 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
======================================================================
At Fri Jan 11 23:10:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
it seems to have remaining colors.
======================================================================
At Sat Jan 12 00:10:04 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
solved colour problem...
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sat Jan 12 10:20:05 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Sat Jan 12 22:55:02 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
category is missing. I would go for Track.
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 13 00:30:07 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
Can't find Track in the list. So I choose Train.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 13 09:25:02 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I don't understand the simplified code in lines 39-46 and 133-139, when all other surface areas have been corrected.
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 13 12:20:28 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
Yes you are right. There was room for some improving ;-)
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 13 13:25:06 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I would have expected it to be "corrected" instead of even more simplified....;-)
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 13 14:00:07 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
But what would be the benefit, if I would build this area exactly? This part is only available in solid colours. So nobody would recognise, that this area is build in this way. (And it's made much easier now.)
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 13 15:50:29 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
No benefit at all, I'm afraid.
I like to see quads following corresponding edgelines.
You have done a great job here and eliminated a lot of t-junctions by splitting large
squares into triangles and quads, matching different vertices.
I had expected all surface area to be done like that.
And yes, I know, all the box4-1 is "floating" on top of bigger quads.
======================================================================
At Wed Mar 20 12:00:06 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Are there more opinions?
|