Unofficial File parts/s/3009pt3a.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
CA Header Edit |
0 ~Brick 1 x 6 with "GLASGOW" Text Pattern
0 Name: s\3009pt3a.dat
0 Author: J.C. Tchang [tchang]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Subpart
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
2 'hold' votes. (CHHX)
Size: 9588 bytes
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) files:
File reviews and updates:
At Sat Jun 11 06:50:31 2011, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: tchang
At Sat Jun 11 08:30:07 2011, the following review was posted:
At http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?s=3009pt3.dat ,
you have explained how you have created the letter "G":
you rendered it normally from the font and then distorted it manually.
You wanted to make it match your real part instance better this way.
However, I think that the instance you have has a small printing error,
where during the print process ink flowed around a little,
so the "G" received a glitch. I think that we should not model such
glitches. We also do not model dents in the bricks, patterns which
are not perfectly horizontal, scratches or moulding relicts.
Now, some of the 1x6 bricks with patterns need attention due to this:
it looks to me that in
, you have manually undone the "G" manipulation. However, the G now
looks "manipulated". I think you should re-render it from the font cleanly.
This is why I am holding those 2 parts.
Differently, the files
still contain the "G distortion manipulation", and that way their "G"
in the pattern looks different than 3009pt12.dat, 3009pt13.dat.
This breaks systematics, which is why I am holding those.
I suggest to re-render the "G" from the font cleanly here as well.
At Mon Dec 24 07:55:49 2012 part 'parts/s/3009s02.dat' was renamed to 'parts/s/3009pt3a.dat'.
At Sun Mar 10 17:20:03 2013, the following review was posted:
All parts I have seen with this pattern matches perfect to this creation. As I do not know how the original design from TLG is I _have_ to assume it is intended like it is on the bricks.
At Sun Mar 26 14:55:00 2017, the following review was posted:
Here are some more samples:
basically none of the parts look the same and we should therefore go for the ideal way. It's what we have done with Mike's icecream pattern and my rocket with moon pattern.