|
|
Unofficial File parts/s/2865s04.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
Download |
View Diff |
Review |
Edit |
CA Header Edit |
Events
File Header:
0 ~Subpart - Train Track 9V - Interlocking Track End
0 Name: s\2865s04.dat
0 Author: Kevin Roach [KROACH]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Subpart
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !CATEGORY Train
0 !HISTORY 2012-09-08 [KROACH] Made BFC compliant
0 !HISTORY 2012-09-10 [KROACH] Added cone primitive 1-4con0
Status:
 Needs more votes. (F)
Size: 13077 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=novote
MagFors=novote
Philo=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) files:
File reviews and updates:
At Wed Mar 30 17:30:15 2011, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
======================================================================
At Wed Mar 30 19:10:05 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
it's difficult to review this part without its parent
parts properly BFCed on the PT.
I think that this triangle
3 16 10 -2.5 -42.75 10 -3.5 -46.75 10 -11 -46.75
is wrongly BFCed
======================================================================
At Wed Mar 30 19:40:09 2011, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Yes, you're right. Corrected.
"it's difficult to review this part without its parent" Yes, I know... just did this one because I needed the code for flexible rail parts.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sat Apr 2 15:10:07 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
The rect-primitive at line 105 is to big.
A line at line 132 is to long.
There is a red triangle at line 193.
There is a square hole at 0 0 -55.5.
Is it missing surface here: 4 16 10 0 57.75 10 0 60 0 0 60 0 0 57.75 ?
======================================================================
At Sat Apr 2 15:45:07 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I've also found two bfc wrong quads at lines 113 and 119.
======================================================================
At Sun Apr 3 07:40:08 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I'll have a closer look!
======================================================================
At Mon Apr 4 14:45:08 2011, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Hopefully corrected some of these errors, plus a bunch of other ones I discovered in the process.
"There is a square hole at 0 0 -55.5. " I've not seen this one?
"Is it missing surface here: 4 16 10 0 57.75 10 0 60 0 0 60 0 0 57.75"
I'd say no. It's missing in the straight track, but would overlap in the curved one.
Sometimes harder to fix someone else parts than building them...
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Mon Apr 4 18:20:22 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
" "There is a square hole at 0 0 -55.5. " I've not seen this one? "
And somehow you managed to fix it anyway...;)
I see what you mean, there is a difference in how the straight and the curved rail, uses this subfile.
Are you working on them aswell?
======================================================================
At Mon Apr 4 18:30:27 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
No, not at the moment. I just needed the end to create the flexible rail.
======================================================================
At Tue May 3 11:40:03 2011, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Corrected bleeding quad
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Tue May 3 20:25:05 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Sat Jul 30 01:50:04 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
why are the comments of the form
0 // Comment: xyz
instead of just
0 // xyz
?
======================================================================
At Mon Sep 10 17:40:12 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
Added the primitive 1-4con0.dat on front corners.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Wed Oct 3 16:25:03 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Just a question:
Who is the original Author of this Subpart?
======================================================================
At Wed Oct 3 17:20:03 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Ugh - we have a problem.
The backup part I have has the following header:
0 ~Train Track 9V Sleeper Interlocking End Section
0 Name: s\2865s04.dat
0 Author: Manfred Moolhuysen
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Subpart
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !HISTORY 2002-11-29 [ludo] Secondary author
0 !HISTORY 2002-11-30 [PTadmin] Official Update 2002-05
0 !HISTORY 2002-12-23 [ludo] Moved studs to main part for stud-logos to be aligned correctly
0 !HISTORY 2003-05-16 [unknown] Made some corrections (Y-level) in both Track finger connections
0 !HISTORY 2004-11-06 [PTadmin] Official Update 2004-04
0 !HISTORY 2007-08-29 [PTadmin] Header formatted for Contributor Agreement
0 !HISTORY 2008-07-01 [PTadmin] Official Update 2008-01
0 !HISTORY 2011-03-30 [Philo] BFCed with Windz, more primitives, minor corrections
Moreover, there are some slight dimension differences here and there. Since this subpart is used on many tracks, it's no good!
======================================================================
At Wed Oct 3 20:50:06 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I can confirm that history.
======================================================================
At Wed Oct 3 20:55:02 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
I'd watched only the header and thought, that there is something wrong...
But now we have a much bigger problem with this part. :-(
|
Certified! (ACCX)
3 subfiles aren't certified. (SSSF)