|
|
Unofficial File parts/99206.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
Download |
Review |
Edit |
CA Header Edit |
Events
File Header:
0 Plate 2 x 2 x 0.667 with Two Studs On Side and Two Raised
0 Name: 99206.dat
0 Author: J.C. Tchang [tchang]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 // Underside Stud
Status:
Certified! (ACCX)
Size: 1954 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=novote
Steffen=certify
cwdee=certify
mikeheide=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) files:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Fri Jun 22 09:20:03 2012, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: tchang
Comments:
Warning : This version was made with 87609.DAT part reference
I don't see real underside
The Design number is actually unknown (Used in Set 10226 Sopwith)Camel)
======================================================================
At Fri Jun 22 14:25:03 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Design number is 99206.
======================================================================
At Fri Jun 22 17:45:46 2012 part 'parts/4654577.dat' was renamed to 'parts/99206.dat'.
======================================================================
At Sun Jul 1 08:10:03 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: tchang
Comments:
Now, I see this part ... so, I suppress underside rib
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sun Jul 1 21:05:03 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Sun Jul 1 22:20:08 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Thu Jul 26 19:00:06 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: C3POwen
Certification: novote
Comments:
The part number seems to be slightly off, according to BrickLink:
http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemIn.asp?P=90266
Also see: http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?s=90266
======================================================================
At Thu Jul 26 19:20:02 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
I confirm that this part IS 99206. 90266 is... 99206 when looked upside down!!! ;)
======================================================================
At Thu Jul 26 19:40:05 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
This is so funny...Big smile!
======================================================================
At Wed Sep 19 10:15:07 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mkennedy
Certification: novote
Comments:
Suggest using box5-4a for the top and box4o4a for the bottom then placing a rectangle between them at the step. The same can be done to the inside.
======================================================================
At Wed Sep 19 10:20:04 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mkennedy
Certification: novote
Comments:
On second thought You may want to use box4-7a instead of bos5-4 for the inside top box.
======================================================================
At Wed Sep 19 16:45:03 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
A design without t-junctions is always better than one with many box-primitives.
This part could be improved.
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 07:10:03 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 12:30:09 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mkennedy
Certification: novote
Comments:
Noticed that the origin point is slightly off center also?
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 12:55:04 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
The center is in the middle of the higher front half. For me it is placed in the right position.
======================================================================
At Fri Nov 16 17:15:39 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
The inside of the understud is not correct.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mostlytechnic/8182220768/in/photostream/
Or are there different versions of this design allready?
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 19 07:50:04 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: tchang
Comments:
You are right for underside stud.
I copy/paste this from 87609 ... but it's not the same.
I work later for boxes suggestions.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sat Dec 29 21:25:09 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Mon Mar 11 10:50:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
I would like to see less t-juntions and stud groups.
This shouldn't take too much time. But I need the permission to touch this part.
======================================================================
At Fri Mar 15 19:15:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Mon Mar 18 06:15:03 2013 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
======================================================================
At Mon Mar 18 06:15:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
|