|
|
Unofficial File parts/93061.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
Download |
Review |
Edit |
CA Header Edit |
Events
File Header:
0 Arm Skeleton with Vertical Clip Bent 53.13
0 Name: 93061.dat
0 Author: Magnus Forsberg [MagFors]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !CATEGORY Minifig
Status:
 1 'hold' vote. (CCHX)
Size: 3136 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=certify
MagFors=novote
Philo=certify
cwdee=hold
mikeheide=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) files:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Wed Jan 2 11:40:03 2013, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
I want to give these better names.
Is this even an arm? Or a "Bar bent with two clips (horizontal/vertical)"?
Were should the origin be?
Orientation?
I want to set an angle in the desription? Which one?
The obtuse, between the two arms?
Or the acute, away from a straight line through the first arm?
======================================================================
At Wed Jan 2 13:15:06 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
How did you measure the angle? This one is a special value, but does the angle for the other arm (56.31) has a meaning?
Maybe you could have used a slanted cyls instead of quads for the joint? (granted, not easy to compute values ;)
Why did you use 2 4-4 cylinders on the long section?
======================================================================
At Wed Jan 2 14:40:19 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
That's the one that made me wonder.
56.31 is the angle between x-axis and the first arm. Not good to use here, I know.
I'll try to tweak a 1-4cyls.
I had a cyli in the sub-file at first atemp. But yes, you are right, it's now no longer needed.
======================================================================
At Wed Jan 2 15:00:06 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Ah - I just realize that 56.31=atan(3/2)...
======================================================================
At Fri Jan 4 11:55:04 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
Moved origin and used 1-4cyls2.
It wasn't too hard. Trial and error until I hit the target...
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Fri Jan 4 12:50:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Looks good to me...
======================================================================
At Fri Jan 4 13:25:04 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
Comments:
I think modelling the outgrowth at the elbow would take only resources. So I feel I can cert here.
======================================================================
At Sun Mar 24 10:35:02 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: hold
Comments:
I think the angle of the upper arm should be consistent with 93609 and maybe even vertical.
======================================================================
At Sun Mar 24 10:50:09 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
Comments:
In LDD they do not have the same angle!
======================================================================
At Sun Mar 24 13:20:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I had both parts in my hand while making these two.
I also made several tests, both in LDD and IRL, to get the angles correct.
======================================================================
At Sun Mar 24 13:55:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: hold
Comments:
I'm not disputing the angle between the two sections, merely the orientation.
======================================================================
At Sun Mar 24 14:45:13 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
OK, I agree with Chris here, that the starting bar should have the same angle as the other part. So you can substitude one part easily with the other part.
======================================================================
At Mon Mar 25 08:20:05 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
No, I think this orientation is good, because it gives simple coordinates to clips centers, and hand has simple vertical orientation. Might possibly be rotated 90 degrees around X-axis, but I think this is better.
|
Certified! (ACCCX)