Parts Tracker :: Parts List :: Activity :: Submit :: PT Tools :: PT Reference :: LDraw Specifications :: Lookup

Unofficial File parts/71986.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

part image

File Header:

0 Technic Ribbed Hose 11L
0 Name: 71986.dat
0 Author: Remco Canten [rempie]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !CATEGORY Hose
0 !KEYWORDS 7 mm D., 35 Ribs, 86 mm

0 !HISTORY 2013-08-03 [rempie] Changed name to Technic Ribbed Hose 35 Ribs.
0 !HISTORY 2013-08-09 [rempie] distance changed to 6.25

Status:
Needs more votes. (X)
Size: 1814 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:
(no current reviews for this file)

Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)

Related (unofficial) files:
(none)

File reviews and updates:

At Sat Aug 3 10:15:11 2013, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: rempie
======================================================================
At Sat Aug 3 11:40:06 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
Part Type must be: Unofficial_Part
Origin should be in the middle of the part.
Rotation should match the rotation of the existing parts.

For discussion: What's about the name? Should it be: "Technic Ribbed Hose..." or "Hose, Ribbed..." or "Ribbed Hose..." and what's about the length: in mm, studs and/or ribs?
I would prefer: Hose, Ribbed [Length in Studs] ([Number of Ribs])
But I'm open for better suggestions.

======================================================================
At Sat Aug 3 12:05:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
"Origin should be in the middle of the part.
Rotation should match the rotation of the existing parts. "
I agree that all ribbed hose should share the same orientation/origin. OTOH the flexible hoses are vertical with origin on top. Maybe we could create a new variant of the few ribbed hose existing now to be coherent with other hoses?

I'm fine with Hose Ribbed [Length in Studs]
As I said number of ribs seem to be inconsistant within the same reference/length so I don't favor to put that in description (and the important parameter for building is length, not number of ribs).

======================================================================
At Sat Aug 3 18:45:03 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: rempie
Comments:
adjusted origin, color, angle and header

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sat Aug 3 20:00:06 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
"0 !LDRAW_ORG Part" is reserved to official parts. Parts present on PT (either new or during rework) must carry an "unofficial" tag:
"0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part"

======================================================================
At Sat Aug 3 20:25:02 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: rempie
Comments:
changed part description

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Tue Aug 6 15:50:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I checked a real part, length (as in LEGO description) is about 88mm ("about" because there is some compressibility). So using a 6.3 ldu separation between ribs gives a more realistic result (see below)

I'd also prefer that the length (in stud) appear in description, as suggested by Max.

1 16 107.1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 79.dat
1 16 -100.8 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 -94.5 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 -88.2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 -81.9 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 -75.6 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 -69.3 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 -63 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 -56.7 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 -50.4 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 -44.1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 -37.8 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 -31.5 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 -25.2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 -18.9 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 -12.6 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 -6.3 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 6.3 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 12.6 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 18.9 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 25.2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 31.5 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 37.8 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 44.1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 50.4 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 56.7 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 63 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 69.3 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 75.6 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 81.9 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 88.2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 94.5 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 100.8 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 -1 80.dat
1 16 -107.1 0 0 0 -1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 79.dat

======================================================================
At Thu Aug 8 20:50:10 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: rempie
Comments:
after i opened part 79.dat i noticed the comment of 6.2 LDU between studs. this i have aplied and they came out beautifully. if i used 6.3 as philo stated i got holes between them. and as the name of the part, i stay with it, because hose 71952 and 71944 speak of ribs and not LDU or mm. and these hoses are the same type but change of length. (13, 19 and 35 Ribs)

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Fri Aug 9 06:55:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
"if i used 6.3 as philo stated i got holes between them."
Are you sure that you have latest, official versions of 79/80 elements?
Total length of 80 middle element is 6.6 LDU (which means that help comment in that file is wrong ;)
Here is a rainbow snapshot of my 19L hose where ribs separation is 6.35 LDU and where you can clealy see an overlap between elements: http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Philo/Misc/43675.png
At 6.2ldu, total length of your part is 86.3mm, a bit short for a theoretical 88mm part. Now since this part is extensible and compressible I can live with that...
As for the description, as Chris suggested, this is a field that can be changed even in official parts.

======================================================================
At Fri Aug 9 14:25:04 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: rempie
Comments:
well i will meet you in the middle. changed distance to 6.25.
also changed keywords and description. hope it is now as it should be.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Thu Aug 15 18:25:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
duplicate ",," in keywords.

BTW, could you adjust the titles of the other ribbed hose files, e.g.
4506910.dat, as well?

======================================================================
At Thu Aug 15 18:40:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
please also ensure that the new distance
consistently is being used throughout all the ribbed hose files

======================================================================
At Thu Aug 15 21:05:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: rempie
Certification: novote
Comments:
gonna investigate. will upload the new file when found.

======================================================================
At Thu Aug 15 21:15:07 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: rempie
Certification: novote
Comments:
How can i adjust an already upoaded part by an other author?
thought i could only upload a part i personly put here.

======================================================================
At Thu Aug 15 23:30:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
@rempie
If you have an official file that you think it needs an update, catch the part - do the necessary change - leave in the history section some words what you have changed (leave all the other header sections like they are) - send the changed part file to the PTAdmin by normal email.
That's it :)

======================================================================
At Fri Aug 16 06:30:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
In addition to Mike: you must also change the part type to: Unofficial_Part.
Conclusion:
1. Make your changes at the Part
2. Make an entry in the history section
3. Change Part Type
4. Send your part to: parts@ldraw.org

======================================================================
At Fri Aug 16 07:25:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
... and please use "rempie" in the !HISTORY line, not "Rempie", as that is the username you registered. Good luck.

======================================================================
At Fri Aug 16 07:25:03 2013 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
======================================================================
At Fri Aug 16 20:20:03 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: rempie
Comments:
changed all usernames. they now are correct.
sorry chris.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Fri Aug 16 20:20:04 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: rempie
Comments:
changed all usernames. they now are correct.
sorry chris.

======================================================================
At Fri Aug 16 21:35:01 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
Comments:
Line 50: Incorrect use of only '0' for comments. 0

======================================================================
At Sat Aug 17 08:55:02 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: rempie
Comments:
i hate it when that line pops up.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.

© 2001-2014 LDraw.org, see Legal Info for details. This website is powered by Peeron.com.

LEGO® is a registered trademark of the LEGO Group, which does not sponsor, endorse, or authorize this site. Visit the official Lego website at http://www.lego.com/.
The LDraw system is a completely unofficial, community run free CAD system which represents official parts produced by the LEGO company.
The LDraw Parts Tracker is maintained and developed by voluntary members of the LDraw organisation.