Parts Tracker :: Parts List :: Activity :: Submit :: PT Tools :: PT Reference :: LDraw Specifications :: Lookup

Unofficial File parts/6556.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | View Diff | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

part image

File Header:

0 Train Window  1 x  4 x  3 with Shutter Holes
0 Name: 6556.dat
0 Author: Lutz Uhlmann
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 1998-10-15 [PTadmin] Official Update 1998-09
0 !HISTORY 2007-07-18 [PTadmin] Header formatted for Contributor Agreement
0 !HISTORY 2008-07-01 [PTadmin] Official Update 2008-01
0 !HISTORY 2013-07-18 [cwdee]   Correct overlapping faces (per Kevin Loddewykx)
0 !HISTORY 2013-12-14 [MagFors] Made BFC compliant, made four holes and two dents


Status:
Needs admin review. (CCF)
Size: 9512 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

MagFors=novote
Philo=certify
Steffen=certify
cwdee=novote
mikeheide=novote

Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)

Related (unofficial) files:
(none)

File reviews and updates:

At Thu Jul 18 15:40:04 2013, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: cwdee
======================================================================
At Sat Jul 20 13:55:05 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Could someone please add the missing shutter holes?

======================================================================
At Fri Jul 26 08:25:09 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
"New" is not a Good Idea (TM) for part titling.
For example, in future there might get created an "even newer"

======================================================================
At Wed Aug 21 23:15:05 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
WARNING "6556.dat" Line 32: Row 2 all zeros: 1 16 26 12 -10 4 0 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 1-4edge.dat
WARNING "6556.dat" Line 34: Row 2 all zeros: 1 16 26 60 -10 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1-4edge.dat
WARNING "6556.dat" Line 36: Row 2 all zeros: 1 16 -26 60 -10 -4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1-4edge.dat
WARNING "6556.dat" Line 38: Row 2 all zeros: 1 16 -26 12 -10 -4 0 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 1-4edge.dat
WARNING "6556.dat" Line 40: Row 2 all zeros: 1 16 26 12 -6 4 0 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 1-4edge.dat
WARNING "6556.dat" Line 42: Row 2 all zeros: 1 16 26 60 -6 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1-4edge.dat
WARNING "6556.dat" Line 43: Row 2 all zeros: 1 16 -26 60 -6 -4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1-4edge.dat
WARNING "6556.dat" Line 45: Row 2 all zeros: 1 16 -26 12 -6 -4 0 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 1-4edge.dat
WARNING "6556.dat" Line 68: Row 2 all zeros: 1 16 26 12 -6 4 0 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 1-4ndis.dat
WARNING "6556.dat" Line 69: Row 2 all zeros: 1 16 26 60 -6 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1-4ndis.dat
WARNING "6556.dat" Line 70: Row 2 all zeros: 1 16 -26 60 -6 -4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1-4ndis.dat
WARNING "6556.dat" Line 71: Row 2 all zeros: 1 16 -26 12 -6 -4 0 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 1-4ndis.dat
WARNING "6556.dat" Line 83: Row 2 all zeros: 1 16 26 12 -10 4 0 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 1-4ndis.dat
WARNING "6556.dat" Line 84: Row 2 all zeros: 1 16 26 60 -10 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1-4ndis.dat
WARNING "6556.dat" Line 85: Row 2 all zeros: 1 16 -26 60 -10 -4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1-4ndis.dat
WARNING "6556.dat" Line 86: Row 2 all zeros: 1 16 -26 12 -10 -4 0 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 1-4ndis.dat


======================================================================
At Sat Dec 14 20:30:06 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
New description.
Made BFC compliant.
Added two window dents and four shutter holes.
Corrected all zero primitives.

How should we do with the "drilled" stud primitives?
I tried to add holes in subpart s\4209s02.dat, but no one seamed to like them.
I haven't gotten any votes at that part.

In this part there is a need for two more, differently drilled stud primitives.


Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sat Dec 14 20:45:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Maybe we could create a 1/2 or 3/4 stud primitive and complete geometry depending on exact need. This way we would keep stud notion for automatic connectivity while avoiding stud primitive galore. Of course if a specific drilled stud appears in several part it will be worth promoting it to primitive.

======================================================================
At Fri Dec 20 16:45:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Fri Dec 20 17:25:13 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
@Philo
Your suggestion would solve the connection issue, but how about the orientation?
Many of these drilled stud do have a logo on top.

I ask again, Do you think I should create a 3/4-stud, and use that one here, and in s\4209s02?
Other opinions?

======================================================================
At Sat Jun 21 06:45:03 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: hold
Comments:
Is the stud geometry different to the stud19[a-d] series as used in s/4209s02?

======================================================================
At Sat Jul 5 13:35:02 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:

Yes, the holes in stud19(a-d) are placed at x=+/-2 and z=+/-6.
In this part the holes are placed at x=+/-4 and z=+6.


======================================================================
At Sat Jul 5 14:00:24 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: hold
Comments:
OK - this deserves a new set of studs then.

======================================================================
At Sun Jul 6 08:55:02 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
BODY TESTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Line 19: Flat subfile is scaled in flat direction 1 16 34 72 6 -2 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 2 2-4edge.dat
Line 20: Flat subfile is scaled in flat direction 1 16 34 72 6 -2 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 2 2-4ndis.dat
Line 23: Flat subfile is scaled in flat direction 1 16 34 68 6 2 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 -2 2-4edge.dat
Line 24: Flat subfile is scaled in flat direction 1 16 34 68 6 2 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 -2 2-4ndis.dat
Line 27: Flat subfile is scaled in flat direction 1 16 34 64 6 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 4-4edge.dat
Line 28: Flat subfile is scaled in flat direction 1 16 34 64 6 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 4-4ndis.dat
Line 30: Flat subfile is scaled in flat direction 1 16 -34 72 6 -2 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 2 2-4edge.dat
Line 31: Flat subfile is scaled in flat direction 1 16 -34 72 6 -2 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 2 2-4ndis.dat
Line 34: Flat subfile is scaled in flat direction 1 16 -34 68 6 2 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 -2 2-4edge.dat
Line 35: Flat subfile is scaled in flat direction 1 16 -34 68 6 2 0 0 0 -4 0 0 0 -2 2-4ndis.dat
Line 38: Flat subfile is scaled in flat direction 1 16 -34 64 6 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 4-4edge.dat
Line 39: Flat subfile is scaled in flat direction 1 16 -34 64 6 2 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 2 4-4ndis.dat
Line 97: Flat subfile is scaled in flat direction 1 16 -36 34 -4 0 -4 0 -2 0 0 0 0 -2 4-4ndis.dat
Line 103: Flat subfile is scaled in flat direction 1 16 36 34 -4 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 -2 4-4ndis.dat


Report generated on 2014-07-06 with DATHeader version 3.0.17.1

======================================================================
At Sun Jul 6 09:35:02 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:

OK, I'll make some new studs. How do I number them?
Would stud25a-d be next?


======================================================================
At Mon Jul 7 08:00:10 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
stud25 is used, but there is a gap at stud24, so please use stud24a-d.


© 2001-2014 LDraw.org, see Legal Info for details. This website is powered by Peeron.com.

LEGO® is a registered trademark of the LEGO Group, which does not sponsor, endorse, or authorize this site. Visit the official Lego website at http://www.lego.com/.
The LDraw system is a completely unofficial, community run free CAD system which represents official parts produced by the LEGO company.
The LDraw Parts Tracker is maintained and developed by voluntary members of the LDraw organisation.