Unofficial File parts/62361.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

File Header:

0 Car Mudguard  6 x  1.5 x  1 with Arch
0 Name: 62361.dat
0 Author: Kevin Roach [KROACH]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 2012-09-19 [KROACH] Made BFC compliant
0 !HISTORY 2012-09-19 [KROACH] Removed some conditional lines
0 !HISTORY 2012-09-19 [KROACH] Replaced conditional lines

0 BFC INVERTNEXT

Status:
2 'hold' votes. (HHX)
Size: 16292 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

MMR1988=hold
MagFors=hold
mikeheide=novote

Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)

Related (unofficial) files:
(none)

File reviews and updates:

At Thu May 7 04:14:01 2009, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
======================================================================
At Thu May 7 06:44:01 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
I would like to certify, but as this part is not BFC'ed I don't like to certify. Otherwise very good job. No Errors, Origin ok.

======================================================================
At Thu May 7 08:20:02 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Agreed, a very nice part. BFCing it should not be difficult, we can provide assistance if needed.

======================================================================
At Sun Jul 19 07:30:05 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
BFC statement not set.

======================================================================
At Mon Jan 18 17:22:52 2010, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
BFC'ed

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Tue May 11 07:50:03 2010, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
has BFC errors

======================================================================
At Sun Jun 6 11:50:02 2010, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
I just see that it is not only change the winding needed here.

======================================================================
At Wed Sep 19 13:15:04 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
I made a lot of changes to this file.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Wed Sep 19 14:20:03 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: hold
Comments:
Looks very good, but there is a completely flat triangle at line 129 (can probably be simply suppressed).
Maybe you should leave the conditional lines beneath the part in concave areas. While they are not mandatory, they trigger smooth shading in LDview, making the part look better.

======================================================================
At Wed Sep 19 20:50:03 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
Comments:
Removed flat triangle.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sat Sep 22 13:50:03 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
IRL, and in LDD, this fender has an outer surface parallel to y-z-plane.
In the description, "1 1/2" should be written "1.5"

======================================================================
At Sun Sep 30 20:45:07 2012 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
======================================================================
At Mon Mar 11 19:50:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
Comments:
@MagFors
Change of description take place.
I do not understand the rest of your comment.

======================================================================
At Tue Mar 12 10:50:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
I'm with Magnus here. This surface shouldn't be sloped.
@Mike: If you look at this part straight from the front, then the mudguard should not me sloped at the left side. The inner Area of the mudguard doesn't start at the brick itself but it is starting a bit more outside from the brick. (then it is possible to get the outer surface parallel to y-z-plane.)

======================================================================
At Tue Mar 12 16:40:06 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
I have to dig this part out and have a look at it. All online resouces looked this this current approach is ok.

======================================================================
At Tue Mar 12 17:05:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
Please have a look at this picture, I took from bricklink:
http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b334/MMR88/LDraw/62361_zps4a936a13.jpg

======================================================================
At Wed Mar 13 16:40:05 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
Thanks for the picture. Maybe I got your concern meanwhile, but I need the real part in my hand :)