|
|
Unofficial File parts/61480.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
Download |
Review |
Edit |
CA Header Edit |
Events
File Header:
0 Tyre 68.7 x 34 R
0 Name: 61480.dat
0 Author: Santeri Piippo [arezey]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
Status:
 1 subfile isn't certified. (CSX)
Size: 15033 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=novote
MagFors=novote
mikeheide=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) files:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Mon Mar 22 02:45:20 2010, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: arezey
Comments:
Another night without sleep... lucky I have the Monday off. :)
The interior may be a tad off. However it looks visually good enough for me and part builds fine into 41896.dat. Thus I consider this part good enough to not need a Needs Work modifier.
======================================================================
At Mon Mar 22 10:05:05 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Who said "addictive"? ;o) Have a good night!
I am ok with the interior, but the thing that bothers me a bit is that the place where it meets the rim of 41896 is one ldu too large, and the lip of tire is slightly offset (one ldu too I think) in 41896 groove.
Look at it with an opaque 41896 and a trans tire. Now if you decide it's OK I'll follow you, it's impossible to tell with in black color!!!
To avoid these problems, I build the tire section that meets the wheel from the wheel itself, stripping it down to its rim and add a few invertnext...
======================================================================
At Mon Mar 22 14:55:11 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Well it was like "gah I've been trying to get sleep for two hours now to no avail. And it's epic boredom. Hmm... I know! I'll finish that tyre I've been working on!" ^_^!
I'll look into the rim problem..
======================================================================
At Mon Mar 22 23:35:04 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
I already found new parts to work on and thus will not fix this issue. :)
======================================================================
At Tue Mar 23 18:40:03 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Would you mind if I fixed it? (I don't guarantee I'll do it!)
======================================================================
At Tue Mar 23 19:40:12 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
If you can fix it, feel free to go ahead.
======================================================================
At Wed Mar 24 10:40:04 2010, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Corrected overall dimensions, improved adaptation to 41896, rebuilt interior. Tell me what you think...
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sat Mar 27 11:55:02 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
Comments:
I think it looks great ;-)
======================================================================
At Sat Mar 27 15:40:08 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Looks fine for me too. :)
But I'm reluctant to certify as I'm the original author!
======================================================================
At Sat Mar 27 15:45:15 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
btw Philo you forgot the history entry out.
======================================================================
At Sat Mar 27 17:27:36 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Here is the deal, I certify the subpart (I have not touched it) and you certify the wheel - if you find it OK - (I am the last who modified it) ;o)
The history will do...
======================================================================
At Thu Apr 1 20:40:04 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Wed Mar 13 21:55:15 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
I would really like to certify, but there are two only 0 comments. :-(
======================================================================
At Wed Mar 13 22:10:03 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
corrected the two lines in question. but in my eyes this should never be something to hold or novote. Just my personal opinion.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Wed Mar 13 22:10:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Wed Mar 13 22:30:13 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
Comments:
Well, why not note it as a novote? My personal aspiration is to have almost perfect parts.
If this is not the case, I can not certify the part. But I don't want to be in somebody's way, who feel, that the part is correct. If there are two other reviewers, who think, that the part is OK, then it is OK.
======================================================================
At Wed Mar 13 22:50:09 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
No, it isn't ready. It should get a standardized description first.
======================================================================
At Wed Mar 13 22:55:02 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Magnus, I think you're right.
|
Needs admin review. (CCX)