Parts Tracker :: Parts List :: Activity :: Submit :: PT Tools :: PT Reference :: LDraw Specifications :: Lookup

Unofficial File parts/6051.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | View Diff | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

part image

File Header:

0 ~Boat Bow 12 x 12 x  5.333 Hull Inside
0 Name: 6051.dat
0 Author: Paul Easter [pneaster]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !CATEGORY Boat
0 !KEYWORDS pirate, pirates, ship, skull, Armada

0 !HISTORY 2002-11-30 [PTadmin] Official Update 2002-05
0 !HISTORY 2007-07-09 [PTadmin] Header formatted for Contributor Agreement
0 !HISTORY 2008-07-01 [PTadmin] Official Update 2008-01
0 !HISTORY 2012-10-02 [Steffen] BFC rationalisation
0 !HISTORY 2013-08-11 [theJudeAbides] Fixed Errors, Used More Primitives

0 // Bottom

Status:
Needs more votes. (F)
Size: 14232 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

MMR1988=novote
MagFors=novote
Steffen=novote
arezey=novote
mikeheide=novote
theJudeAbides=novote

Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)

Related (unofficial) files:
(none)

File reviews and updates:

At Tue Oct 16 05:35:02 2012, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
======================================================================
At Tue Oct 16 05:35:02 2012 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
======================================================================
At Tue Oct 16 08:25:04 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
for those wondering, here is what "BFC rationalisation" means:
http://forums.ldraw.org/read.php?19,6449,6449#msg-6449

======================================================================
At Wed Oct 17 20:05:04 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Incorrect use of rect-primitives to make boxes.
Studs scaled in y-direction.
Two floating, unnecessary studs.

Could use some stud-groups.

======================================================================
At Mon Aug 12 07:25:07 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: theJudeAbides
Comments:
Did a fair amount of work:
- Organized the file
- Deleted extraneous studs
- Refactored many of the offending rects into various types of boxes, making sure not to have any extra edgelines where they meet.
- Inlined scaled studs and converted to cylos with ring.
- Used more stud groups
- Eliminated T-Junctions from highly visible places (like the bottom and top surfaces.
- Refactored the bottom so as not to have extraneous, unneeded surfaces.
- Added missing conditional lines around the curved part of the upper bow.

I think that's everything. Let me know if there are any further problems.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Mon Aug 12 10:00:38 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
First of all: You did again a great job.
But...
This parts needs a "Needs Work" statement because the complete underside is missing.
And there are still some visible t-junctions around the ndis-primitivs. (Note that I don't have a problem with these t-junctions)


======================================================================
At Mon Aug 12 16:15:06 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
When I cleaned 6052+6053 and 2558+2559, I subfiled half of the hull,
and reused those in both boats hull, 12 and 16 wide.

I guess the same could be done here?

1 14 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2556.dat
1 12 40 0 20 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 6050.dat
1 14 0 -48 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2557.dat
1 12 40 -48 20 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 6051.dat

1 11 0 -48 300 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\2559s01.dat
1 13 80 -48 300 -1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 s\2559s01.dat
1 11 0 0 300 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2558.dat
1 13 40 0 300 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 6052.dat

But I understand if you choose not to do it like that. There are less common surfaces in the bow than in the stern.


======================================================================
At Mon Aug 12 16:20:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
And all studs should have the same orientation. Some are even mirrored.

======================================================================
At Mon Aug 12 19:30:08 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Shouldn't history lines use letter case?

I also cannot understand the rationale behind having a (Needs Work) for a part like this which the normal user doesn't see anyway.

======================================================================
At Mon Aug 12 19:35:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: theJudeAbides
Certification: novote
Comments:
@MMR:
I thought about doing the undersides, but didn't think they were necessary because a. they weren't originally included and b. they'll never be seen. It seemed to me like it would only serve to bulk up the file size with no positive gains. I could add it though, if everyone thinks it's necessary.
Also, I thought I fixed all the t-junctions by the NDIS's. Where is the problem, the upper ones on top, or the lower ones on bottom?

@MagFors:
I did think about subfiling the sides and then mirroring them. I think if you guys want there to be an underside, I'll probably do this to save space.
Also, the thing with the studs is a remnant from the previous author. I'll see what I can do. However, because these don't have stud logos, there are only 1xNs but no Nx1s, so it becomes necessary to rotate them.

======================================================================
At Mon Aug 12 20:15:05 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Well, let me explain.
The part is from 2002. This was a time where the specs wasn't so hard. (blabla). So nowadays we are trying to make complete parts - of course simplified sometimes, but complete. And my definition of a part is: "A thing, that contains a volume and could be mould" And that's the reason why I asked for the underside.

Something about t-junctions: If you look these lines from top:
1 16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 2-4ndis.dat

2 4 2 0 2 0 0 2
2 1 -2 0 2 0 0 2

2 5 0 0 2 0 0 5
2 5 0 0 2 0.25 0 2.75
2 5 0 0 2 -0.25 0 2.75

You will see a vertex (indicated by the arrow) that causes t-junctions. But of course many of our parts are made in your way, so it's OK with me (as I've written in my last comment)

======================================================================
At Sun Nov 17 17:40:07 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
tons of mirrored studs.
should be repaired

======================================================================
At Sun Nov 17 17:55:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
If you not have seen the underside, you can't model it. In that case please add a "Need Work" to the title and leave a comment in that you describe what you could not model.


© 2001-2014 LDraw.org, see Legal Info for details. This website is powered by Peeron.com.

LEGO® is a registered trademark of the LEGO Group, which does not sponsor, endorse, or authorize this site. Visit the official Lego website at http://www.lego.com/.
The LDraw system is a completely unofficial, community run free CAD system which represents official parts produced by the LEGO company.
The LDraw Parts Tracker is maintained and developed by voluntary members of the LDraw organisation.