Parts Tracker :: Parts List :: Activity :: Submit :: PT Tools :: PT Reference :: LDraw Specifications :: Lookup

Unofficial File parts/60169.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

part image

File Header:

0 Minifig Chain 16L
0 Name: 60169.dat
0 Author: Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Shortcut
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !CATEGORY Minifig Accessory
0 !KEYWORDS 21 links

Status:
Needs more votes. (CX)
Size: 1339 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

MMR1988=novote
MagFors=certify
Steffen=novote
cwdee=novote

Required (unofficial) subfiles:

parts/60169k01.dat

Minifig Chain End for Chain 16L

Certified! (ACCX)

Events

parts/60169k02.dat

Minifig Chain Link for Chain 16L

Certified! (ACCX)

Events

Related (unofficial) files:
(none)

File reviews and updates:

At Thu Sep 14 15:10:00 2017, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
======================================================================
At Thu Sep 14 16:20:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: SLS
Certification: novote
Comments:
I thought there were two versions, 17L and 16L, because the ones I have certainly can't be stretched more than 16L (no number on them, 21 floating links).
I see BL has them as aliases too and LDD call them both "CHAIN 16M" (60169 is flexible, 30104 isn't).
Still, not really useful to have them both at 17L in LDraw if we can't use them that way in real life.


======================================================================
At Thu Sep 14 17:30:01 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Makes sense, I'll see that. By "flexible" you mean made from a

======================================================================
At Thu Sep 14 17:30:01 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Makes sense, I'll see that. By "flexible" you mean made from a rubberish plastic? (like Friends hair)

======================================================================
At Thu Sep 14 17:40:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: SLS
Certification: novote
Comments:
No, I meant flexible inside LDD :)
30104 is like a 16M long decorated bar :D
60169 can be flexed, you can place the studs (and links) where you want, almost as the real one.

======================================================================
At Fri Sep 15 10:00:01 2017, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Changed length. Corrected 30104 is on its way too through admin.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Fri Sep 15 11:35:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Now that I made the change... I have some doubts! See the LDD version (red) above Ldraw one!
http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/Philo/misc2/30104.png
I'll check tonight with real parts...


======================================================================
At Fri Sep 15 13:15:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: SLS
Certification: novote
Comments:
That's what I tried to explain: LDD and the real part ARE 16L-long, this one is 17L, and not only in name.

======================================================================
At Fri Sep 15 18:10:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: hold
Comments:
OK... Here are real parts!
https://photos.app.goo.gl/PuSIrZvF92DbBZds1
- old version (30104) is 17L (actually about 17.4L)
- More recent version (60169) is 16L (about 16.2L)
Since the number of links is the same (21), older links are about 7.5% longer than current ones.


======================================================================
At Fri Sep 15 18:10:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Forgot to say... comments and suggestions are welcome!
Also: could someone who has both 5L and 16L chains make a comparison of the length of links?

======================================================================
At Fri Sep 15 19:50:01 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: SLS
Certification: novote
Comments:
So, there were two versions after all ;)
It was doubtful 17L was an error.

As for links sizes, yes, 16L's are shorter. Even the studded ends. I don't have a caliper on hand, and I suck at macrophoto, still:
http://slswww.free.fr/links.jpg (left is 5L, right is 16L)
http://slswww.free.fr/link-stud.jpg (top is 5L, other two are 16L)


======================================================================
At Fri Sep 15 20:10:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: SLS
Certification: novote
Comments:
Oh, and 92338 is "6M" for LEGO and the ones I have are a bit longer than 6L.

======================================================================
At Tue Sep 19 11:35:00 2017, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Mon Oct 9 21:25:00 2017, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Mon Jan 1 23:45:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Mon Jan 1 23:50:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I'm confused here.
Why use all other chains the ...a variants of the elements?
(checkout http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/208a.dat )
Just this one uses ...b ?

======================================================================
At Mon Apr 2 18:45:00 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
@Steffen - the links and ends are of a different size in this part.

======================================================================
At Mon Apr 2 19:20:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Should this part shortened to 300 LDU instead of 304 LDU?

======================================================================
At Tue Apr 10 17:15:01 2018, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes, I think the ends should be placed at stud pitch.


© 2001-2018 LDraw.org, see Legal Info for details. This website is powered by Peeron.com.

LEGO® is a registered trademark of the LEGO Group, which does not sponsor, endorse, or authorize this site. Visit the official Lego website at http://www.lego.com/.
The LDraw system is a completely unofficial, community run free CAD system which represents official parts produced by the LEGO company.
The LDraw Parts Tracker is maintained and developed by voluntary members of the LDraw organisation.