Parts Tracker :: Parts List :: Activity :: Submit :: PT Tools :: PT Reference :: LDraw Specifications :: Lookup

Unofficial File parts/6015.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | View Diff | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

part image

File Header:

0 Tyre 12/ 40 x 11 Wide
0 Name: 6015.dat
0 Author: James Jessiman
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 2007-07-09 [PTadmin] Header formatted for Contributor Agreement
0 !HISTORY 2008-07-01 [PTadmin] Official Update 2008-01
0 !HISTORY 2012-03-17 [Steffen] BFCed, used primitives
0 !HISTORY 2012-03-19 [MagFors] Subfiled, retitled to standardized nomenclature 

0 // Nomenclature: width_(mm)/profile_as_percentage_of_width x rim_diameter_(mm)
0 // Similar designs, 60700 and 87697

Status:
Certified! (ACCF)
Size: 3078 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

MMR1988=novote
MagFors=novote
Philo=certify
Steffen=certify
cwdee=certify

Required (unofficial) subfiles:

parts/s/6015s01.dat

~Tyre 12/ 40 x 11 Wide - 1/36

Certified! (ACCX)

Events

Related (unofficial) files:

parts/30190c01.dat

Wheel Centre Wide with Stub Axles with Tyre 12/ 40 x 11 Wide

Needs more votes. (X)

Events

parts/6014c01.dat

Wheel Rim 11.2 x 10.4 with Tyre 12/ 40 x 11 Wide

Needs admin review. (CCX)

Events

parts/60700.dat

=Tyre 12/ 40 x 11 Wide

Certified! (ACCCF)

Events

File reviews and updates:

At Sun Mar 18 13:45:15 2012, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
======================================================================
At Sun Mar 18 22:15:05 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
May I suggest another solution, like this intead?
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/s/87697s01.dat

Now there are tiny holes in the design, 48-prims doesn't match 36-sided tread.

======================================================================
At Mon Mar 19 00:25:02 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
just go ahead Tim and improve as you like


======================================================================
At Mon Mar 19 00:30:05 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
sorry, I meant Magnus, of course

======================================================================
At Mon Mar 19 19:20:10 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MagFors
Comments:
I listen to many names, but have never been called Tim before...;)


Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Mon Mar 19 21:10:02 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
Comments:
that had happened because I had been looking at the recent
PT reviews, and in the previous files I had seen,
Tim had replied. I noticed the name difference directly after
clicking on the "Submit" button - but too late...

======================================================================
At Thu Jan 3 13:40:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
Comments:
Does anybody have all three types of this tyre for taking a look, what's the difference to 60700? I have checked Brickset but the picture of 6015 and 60700 was the same. On Bricklink they have a different catalogue entry.

======================================================================
At Thu Jan 3 13:50:07 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Sorry, for downgrading again. Due to the fact that 60700 is in the official library, we should solve the problem with the differences between both parts first.

======================================================================
At Thu Jan 3 16:45:06 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I have all three designs.

6015 has an extra shallow ditch placed on one side of the ridge inside the tyre.
It is modeled in LDD, and I don't know why, or how, it is used.

60700 has a triangular slope on the inside instead of the trapetzoid ridge.
Making it easier to push the rim into the tyre, but it also means that it doesn't stay in place.
Maybe that's why it went out of production so quickly and was replaced by 87697.

87697 is correct, as far as I can see.

To me the difference between 6015 and 60700 is insignificant.
The only difference is on the inside of the tyre and never visible.
Do you want me to make them different?

======================================================================
At Thu Jan 3 17:35:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I digged even deeper in in my tyre box.
60700 is an odd design. It seems to exist in many different development stages between 6015 and ready design.
Some have that ditch from 6015, and some don't.
Some have that triangular ridge, and some don't.


======================================================================
At Thu Jan 3 17:35:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Ok, now it becomes crazy.
I talked to a friend, who owns 60700. He told me, that the inner ridge of 60700 is also trapezoid but all of his 60700 tyres have one filled profile area.
If we want to let go 6015 then 60700 or 6015 needs an different name and if the ridge is really triangular it should be modelled IMHO. Otherwise it could confuse the users. And doing an alias isn't a solution here, due to the fact, that the mouldings seems to be different.

======================================================================
At Thu Jan 3 18:10:06 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
I have found this post for the wheels as well:
http://www.bricklink.com/message.asp?ID=649730

I think you are right there are a lot of different versions in this mould. I'm not sure how we should handle this.

======================================================================
At Fri Jan 4 11:10:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
To make it even worse for people keeping track of what goes were.
I have one set 7208 with three different versions of this tyre.
The small truck has four 6015.
The big truck has four 60700, two with triangular ridge, and two with trapetzoid ridge.
The BI says there should be eight 4514560.

As far back as I can see in my BI this tyre has always been called 4514560,
but sometimes it's 6015 in the box and sometimes 60700.

======================================================================
At Fri Jan 4 12:50:07 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
OK, it seem's that we have to find a way. I have two (or the suggestion):
1. Making 60700 as an alias of 6015. (I dislike this way here)
2. Making 60700 with a triangular ridge and without the ditch, instead modelling the ditch in 6015 (I prefer this one)
3. Making 60700 with a trapeziod ridge and without the ditch, instead modelling the ditch in 6015 (My second choise)
4. ..off course there are more possibilities, but these three are the best from my point of view.
Other opinions?


======================================================================
At Wed Dec 11 11:05:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Other opinions?

======================================================================
At Wed Dec 11 13:45:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
No definitive opinion here since I don't have a big selection of these tires...

======================================================================
At Wed Apr 9 21:40:05 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
bump

======================================================================
At Tue Nov 4 20:20:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Bump!!

We need to have a decision here.
The current official file is not BFC, and it is a very common part.

======================================================================
At Wed Dec 3 16:25:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Since 60700 and 6015 parts are seem to be widely intermixed by LEGO, I suggest to make them simply aliases (as it is now actually)!

======================================================================
At Tue Dec 16 07:10:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.


© 2001-2014 LDraw.org, see Legal Info for details. This website is powered by Peeron.com.

LEGO® is a registered trademark of the LEGO Group, which does not sponsor, endorse, or authorize this site. Visit the official Lego website at http://www.lego.com/.
The LDraw system is a completely unofficial, community run free CAD system which represents official parts produced by the LEGO company.
The LDraw Parts Tracker is maintained and developed by voluntary members of the LDraw organisation.