Unofficial File parts/57539a.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

File Header:

0 ~Hose Flexible 19M End Segment
0 Name: 57539a.dat
0 Author: J.C. Tchang [tchang]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

Status:
1 'hold' vote. (HX)
Size: 4846 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

Philo=novote
Steffen=hold
mikeheide=novote

Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)

Related (unofficial) files:

parts/57539.dat

Hose Flexible 19M

2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSX)

Events

File reviews and updates:

At Sun Nov 22 02:02:06 2009, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: tchang
======================================================================
At Sun Dec 27 15:07:36 2009, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Set part type to Part

======================================================================
At Sat Dec 29 22:20:43 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
sorry, but I think this is a subpart:
it is not even closed, so it cannot be a part

======================================================================
At Fri Feb 22 13:20:05 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
All similar flexible elements (eg. 759.dat) are ~parts!

======================================================================
At Fri Feb 22 20:35:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
Comments:
This is exactly the way we went with the other similar parts.
1) put into the parts folder (therefore type part)
2) mark it with a tilde to hide for non prof. user.

So for me it is very much ok like it is.

======================================================================
At Sat Feb 23 21:45:05 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
I can accept that status quo for the time being,
although I do not like it,
but nevertheless, in the header of this file,
the type should definitely be changed to "Subpart".
This really _is_ _not_ a part.

======================================================================
At Sun Feb 24 07:30:05 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
At present I do not have the time to look for the other parts where we used such construct already. If someone could find them and list them here or better in the forum that would be great. We need to find a solution that works for all of us.

======================================================================
At Sun Feb 24 08:15:05 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I agree that this is technically a subpart, but if its part type is set this way, then PT doesn't allow to put it in parts folder! Type of other similar elements is set to part.

======================================================================
At Sun Feb 24 08:25:01 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes, Philo, that is what I remember too.
Additionally I think it is time to make a thread where we store all these files that are somewhat out of our "normal" systematics and why we have done it in this way. If we have a place where these informations are in, we can at one time in the future check for the necessarity of this and maybe change that :)