|
|
Unofficial File parts/54869.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
Download |
Review |
Edit |
CA Header Edit |
Events
File Header:
0 _Electric Light Brick 2 x 3 x 1.333 - TrRed Top - Red LED
0 Name: 54869.dat
0 Author: Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Shortcut Physical_Colour
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
Status:
 Certified! (ACCX)
Size: 302 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=certify
Steffen=certify
cwdee=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) files:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Wed Nov 26 12:42:05 2008, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
======================================================================
At Thu May 28 14:56:03 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Hmm, this is interesting. The Stegosaurus set's box art features a
picture of this brick with the Power Functions logo. If LEGO truly
considers this part as a Power Functions one (though the colour
scheme sure is off!), I'd say that a Power Functions mention should
be included. I'd be for PF keywords.
http://peeron.com:80/inv/sets/4998-1?showpic=10848
======================================================================
At Fri Jul 3 09:26:01 2009, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
compensated subpart changes
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Wed Sep 16 20:34:11 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
This seems to me to be an color shortcut!
======================================================================
At Wed Sep 16 20:48:04 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
imho something identified with a LEGO design number is a part. Of course we could create a part with color 16 used either for top or for bottom - but which one to choose?
======================================================================
At Thu Sep 17 06:16:01 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
I'd say the bottom, as there are two design IDs with the difference only being the top. The problem would then be if you would want other coloured leds than Trans-Red or Trans-Yellow, my suggestion to that would be to make the Cruciform Screw and Button Cell subparts into real parts - it'd even make sense! You can have a button cell and a screw on their own, can't you? You would then have a !HELP section detailing how to make custom LEDs.
======================================================================
At Thu Sep 17 15:02:01 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
This would rise again the question what we call a part in LDraw System of Tools. I know there has been that discussion in the past on the light brick 2 x 4. But I can't find in the moment the thread on Lugnet. It seems that this should be worded in an official document (task for the LSC). Otherwise we will have such a discussion again and again.
======================================================================
At Tue Jan 12 16:02:01 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Not sure about orientation.. I rotate this 180 degrees around Y to have the bulb visible.
======================================================================
At Tue Jan 12 16:06:38 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
I'd rotate this, I mean. I'm not touching anything in this part. :)
======================================================================
At Tue Jan 12 18:38:56 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I have no firm conviction about orientation of this part. If you feel it's better the other way please do it... But in that case don't forget 62930!
======================================================================
At Mon May 30 23:00:06 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I think that we need a color 16 version of this part in some way,
and we should make the existing variants
54869.dat
62930.dat
physical color shortcuts of that
======================================================================
At Mon May 30 23:00:06 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
type IMHO should be changed to "shortcut",
in analogy to the "wheels + tyre shortcuts"
======================================================================
At Tue May 31 12:30:13 2011, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Used generic part, made this physical color shortcut
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Tue May 31 18:50:03 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
- the header has a stray 00
- is it correct that in the current implementation the LED is no longer colored?
======================================================================
At Thu Jun 2 10:50:04 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
There is no difference in how this file coloures the LED. It was clear (colour 47) in the old file aswell.
But I don't know enough about them to say it is correct. Do a yellow and a red LED visualy look the same? Just emitting different coloured light.
I can see that 62503.dat has a light yellow disc in it. Is that correct?
======================================================================
At Wed Jun 29 20:10:04 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
(keeping hold)
does this need a leading _ in the name?
======================================================================
At Wed Jun 29 20:25:03 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes, I have both parts, they do look exactly the same.
======================================================================
At Sat Jul 2 15:55:50 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Please correct the header. It is corrupt.
======================================================================
At Sat Jul 2 23:25:16 2011, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
Fixed header
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Tue Jul 5 22:00:08 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Wed Jul 6 20:10:03 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Sun Mar 24 15:05:02 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: certify
Comments:
Confirmed as a DesignID, so not impacted by http://forums.ldraw.org/read.php?6,8663,8663#msg-8663
|
