|
|
Unofficial File parts/52040.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
Download |
Review |
Edit |
CA Header Edit |
Events
File Header:
0 Brick 12 x 12 with 3 Pin Holes on Sides & Axle Holes in Corners
0 Name: 52040.dat
0 Author: Alex Taylor [anathema]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !HISTORY 2013-04-01 [MMR1988] Removed T-junctions, moved some faces to subpart
Status:
 Needs admin review. (CCX)
Size: 2277 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=certify
Steffen=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) files:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Sun Nov 2 15:50:13 2008, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: anathema
======================================================================
At Wed Nov 5 19:54:02 2008, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
Have you seen also the part from LEGO that we got? Please see here: http://www.ldraw.org/Article490.html
======================================================================
At Wed Nov 5 20:38:04 2008, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: anathema
Certification: novote
Comments:
I hadn't no, but isn't that 47976? That said, the parts are pretty similar - might be scope for subfiling the common bits.
======================================================================
At Wed Nov 5 21:18:02 2008, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
No, subfileing is not needed, because the file only has the wrong filename. In the file itself the correct number is mentioned. So you improve your part with original data!.
Also it is a good idea to follow these (http://www.ldraw.org/library/tracker/ref/filetypesfaq/) guidelines if you are gonna making subfiles!
Otherwise very good work!
======================================================================
At Wed Nov 5 21:38:05 2008, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: anathema
Certification: novote
Comments:
Oh, very good :-) I hope I haven't duplicated anyone else's work, then!
Looking at the picture here http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/47976 it does rather look as if the only difference between the two parts is the corners. I don't have a 47976 for comparison, though, so I could be mistaken.
Assuming that the undersides are basically the same, corners excepted, one possible way to do it would be:
- modify my 52040a to remove the corner axlehole etc
- new subfile 52040b which adds the axlehole to 52040a
- new subfile 47976a which adds the peg to 52040a
- new subfile 52040c (or 47976b :-) which contains the rest of the top surface of the part plus the centre box/tubes
Then 52040 just uses 52040b and 52040c/47976b, and 47976 uses 47976a and 52040c/47976b. Or something like that! :-)
======================================================================
At Thu Nov 6 08:18:01 2008, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
There are several parts that share pegs in corner, so factoring that would be great indeed (http://www.peeron.com/cgi-bin/invcgis/psearch?query=brick+peg&limit=none)
======================================================================
At Fri Nov 7 18:56:11 2008, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
Actually, yes you did duplicate work, because I already selected it here http://www.ldraw.org/Article490.html, but you probably weren't to know, and I hadn't submitted. I'll take a look at how we each approached this.
Definitely 47976 and 52040 should and can share subparts, because that's even what LEGO did. If you look on the underside of a 47976, at least, you will see both numbers. Its possible that the mould has separate "slugs" that can be inserted for the different parts, or one mould was machined from the other. In fact that's why I had withheld my 47976, because I've not yet located a copy of 52040 which I'm sure I have somewhere.
======================================================================
At Fri Nov 7 19:06:01 2008, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: anathema
Certification: novote
Comments:
Heh :-) Maybe we could compare scans of the parts? I only have 52040 myself.
======================================================================
At Thu Jul 2 23:02:04 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Thu Jul 2 23:04:03 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
Comments:
sorry, didn't notice the discussion going on here.
my certify vote just indicates that this part is technically fine.
should you decide to change subfile structure, just go ahead.
I'll happily restore the certify vote then.
======================================================================
At Mon Apr 1 03:35:02 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
- moved studs from \s subfile to here to avoid differently rotated logos
- used more stugs
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Mon Apr 1 17:50:09 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
I tried my best ;-)
======================================================================
At Fri Apr 5 20:55:05 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Sat Apr 20 23:20:04 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Thu Apr 25 06:20:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
Comments:
bump
|
Certified! (ACCX)