Unofficial File parts/41857.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

File Header:

0 ~Motor Pull Back  2 x  6 x  1.333 Type 1 - Base
0 Name: 41857.dat
0 Author: Michael Heidemann [mikeheide]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !CATEGORY Vehicle

Status:
Needs more votes. (CX)
Size: 348 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

MagFors=certify
Steffen=novote
cwdee=novote

Required (unofficial) subfiles:

parts/s/41857s01.dat

~Motor Pull Back 2 x 6 x 1.333 Type 1 - Base Half

Certified! (ACCX)

Events

Related (unofficial) files:

parts/41861.dat	~Motor Pull Back 2 x 6 x 1.667 Type 2 - Base	1 subfile isn't certified. (CSX)	Events
parts/42288.dat	Motor Pull Back 2 x 6 x 1.333 Type 1 Black Base/White Axle	2 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSX)	Events

File reviews and updates:

At Thu May 7 19:56:01 2009, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
======================================================================
At Sat May 16 16:38:02 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
other parts write "Type 1", not "Type1" - this one should also do

======================================================================
At Sat May 16 18:30:13 2009, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
Changed title

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sat May 16 21:56:17 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
hmm, first there was a space missing in the title,
now there's one too much IMHO
(or do you expect to have some Type 10 sometime?) :-)

======================================================================
At Sun May 17 09:38:01 2009, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
Changed category

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Fri Oct 9 12:02:56 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: hold
Comments:
Missing intersection lines where the axle base meets the chassis. Also the chassis quad in question should also be cut against the axle base - it bleeds inside.

======================================================================
At Fri Oct 9 12:10:42 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Doh! The problem is in the subfile.

======================================================================
At Wed Feb 1 14:05:07 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Set category to more general "vehicle".

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Thu Feb 2 21:15:08 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Mon Dec 24 12:40:05 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Fri Mar 22 07:00:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Tue Apr 2 17:45:06 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
sorry to see this this late, but I think the origin choice here
can be improved. currently it is "some" origin, in fact, the one
of the parent assembly when it still had its wrong origin,
i.e., not at the top.
now the parent assembly has been corrected to have it at the top,
but this file still has the old one.
there are 2 possible choices for origin here,
(a) locally selected for this file at its top
(b) putting it where the parent assembly has it
As this is a part (a ~part, yes, but a part), and thus
available for building, I'd like to see the origin corrected this way.
Will of course quickly restore the CERT vote to get this thingy out now finally...

======================================================================
At Wed Apr 3 05:00:17 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
No comments were posted with this review.