Unofficial File parts/41665.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
CA Header Edit |
0 Technic Beam 1 x 4 x 7 with 5 Axleholes and 2 Holes and 1 Slot
0 Name: 41665.dat
0 Author: Kevin Roach [KROACH]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !HISTORY 2014-03-27 [KROACH] Reworked axlehole
1 'hold' vote. (HSSSSSSSSX)
Size: 72048 bytes
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) files:
File reviews and updates:
At Tue Mar 25 09:35:03 2014, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
At Tue Mar 25 17:15:08 2014, the following review was posted:
Whoa! That was quick, very nice work! Guess I've been beaten to this part as well now. Will review in full later but I find the part title over-complicated.
At Wed Mar 26 13:45:03 2014, the following review was posted:
Took a closer look, I think that the 48-cylinder rim at the front of the part seems overkill, 16 should do just fine.
The axleholes at the back should not have a stop inside them. An axle passes through it just fine. There also seems to be a circles at the extremas.
This part seems very large in terms of file size (73kb), could probably cut some fat by splitting this into halves as this part is symmetrical.
At Thu Mar 27 11:25:04 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: KROACH
It will take a while to rework front edge. I am working on it. Also noticed the wrong lines are used on axl2hole.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Thu Mar 27 15:40:09 2014, the following review was posted:
I wonder why you did such a strange scaling here:
1 4 10 0 20 0 -20 0 6.364 0 0 0 0 6.364 2-4cylo.dat (line #34)
With this scaling you are forced to use 5 ring primitives to match the outside. Why not doing some rounding here?
For example use a scaling factor of 6.375.
Btw: is there a special sense for this value? Special connection or something else? If not, I would suggest to use a scaling of 6. So you could use the ring2 scaled by 3 (as it is do normally). And pins and axles would match exactly.
At Sat Mar 29 23:25:03 2014, the following review was posted:
The use of the axl2hole primitive creates unwanted edge lines.
Some other edge lines at those primitives are missing.
A change like Max's suggestion would force the beam sides to have different, sloping thickness.
Add this line to see it better:
2 24 -10 6 -100 -10 6 100