|
|
Unofficial File parts/3888a.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
Download |
Review |
Edit |
CA Header Edit |
Events
File Header:
0 ~Vehicle Chassis 14 x 6.5 with Tow-Hook
0 Name: 3888a.dat
0 Author: Tore Eriksson [Tore_Eriksson]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !KEYWORDS Fabuland
0 !HISTORY 2007-10-08 [mikeheide] fixed errors
0 !HISTORY 2011-02-13 [anathema] BFC'd, used stug primitives, added keywords
Status:
 2 'hold' votes. (CCHHX)
Size: 19442 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=hold
MagFors=certify
Philo=novote
Steffen=hold
anathema=novote
cwdee=novote
dulcaoin=novote
mikeheide=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) files:
File reviews and updates:
At Tue Mar 5 21:12:02 2002, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: simlego
======================================================================
At Sat Mar 23 17:08:03 2002, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: BrickCaster
Certification: hold
Comments:
used MLCad, hold: Missing quads in female attachment (bottom view)
used L3P -check: many "row all zero" warnings
used Notepad: Not BFC compliant
======================================================================
At Sun Dec 8 01:58:04 2002, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: simlego
Comments:
No "row all zero" warnings found using l3p v1.3
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sat Mar 22 10:18:07 2003, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: certify
Comments:
This definitely exists in blue - so the CMDLINE should be removed - can be done by admin edit.
I think the disc on top of the tow hook should be offset, more like what was done in 4796.dat, but I won't hold just for this.
======================================================================
At Sat Mar 22 10:44:04 2003, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: certify
Comments:
Edited header as admin as explained in x684c01.
======================================================================
At Wed Jul 2 04:00:01 2003, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: pneaster
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Thu Jul 3 00:00:00 2003, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
some matrix all zero "errors"
======================================================================
At Mon Jul 14 05:12:30 2003, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: sbliss
Certification: certify
Comments:
I don't have this part, I haven't seen, I'm just doing a basic admin review. The position & orientation are good, the name maybe should be 'car base' rather than 'car chassis', but this part has more car-specific details than most 'car base' parts, so I'm leaving it as-is.
======================================================================
At Sun Jul 20 17:00:03 2003, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
these quads
4 16 40 4 -80 62 4 -80 62 4 80 40 4 80
4 16 -40 4 -80 -62 4 -80 -62 4 80 -40 4 80
are too short where they touch the cylindrical segment
======================================================================
At Sat Apr 10 15:26:02 2004, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: OrionP
Certification: novote
Comments:
This part also needs to be renamed to something non theme specific
======================================================================
At Sun Sep 5 15:00:04 2004, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: SirBugge
Certification: novote
Comments:
Error: L/W swapped in title
======================================================================
At Thu Jan 19 22:26:02 2006, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: guyvivan
Certification: hold
Comments:
Many error L3p (row "0-1" all zeros)
Many missing lines and other minor errors (coordinates intersection).
Studs orientation !
And not BFC'ed :o[
======================================================================
At Mon Oct 8 20:12:04 2007, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
fixed all mentioned errors. still not BFC'ed.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sat Dec 1 10:16:02 2007, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Sat May 16 14:36:04 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
the T junction where these quads meet
4 13 -12 0 -140 -6 0 -150 6 0 -150 12 0 -140
4 12 -40 0 -140 -40 0 140 40 0 140 40 0 -140
could be improved, looks sometimes suboptimal in MLCad
======================================================================
At Sat Feb 12 12:25:03 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: anathema
Certification: novote
Comments:
Studs could be rotated 90 degrees ccw to match the actual part. Could also use stug4.dat.
======================================================================
At Sun Feb 13 15:25:04 2011, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: anathema
Comments:
BFC'd, added the stug primitives and renamed.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sun Feb 13 15:35:03 2011, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: anathema
Comments:
Changed title to distinguish between the two parts: this one has a tow-hook, and 3888 does not.
======================================================================
At Sun Feb 13 19:15:04 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I do not like the current suffix "with Tow-Hook" very much.
All Fabuland Chassis feature that hook to chain them.
Having this in the title suggests that this would be discriminitating element, but it in fact isn't. I suggest that we remove this suffix.
======================================================================
At Sun Feb 13 19:55:07 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: anathema
Certification: novote
Comments:
Please make another suggestion, then. We need a way to distinguish between this part and the very similar http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItem.asp?P=3888c01.
======================================================================
At Sun Feb 13 22:40:03 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
yikes, the link you posted shows a part previously unknown to me.
that's the first fabuland car chassis *without* connectors at front and rear :-/ retracting previous comment
======================================================================
At Mon Feb 14 08:15:04 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Maybe we should rename this one 3888a (it's the older version) and the tow-hook-less version 3888b?
======================================================================
At Mon Feb 14 17:20:04 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: anathema
Certification: novote
Comments:
Possibly. Certainly the new 12x6 chassis is listed as part #4362 on BL, and the old part I have here has 4362 moulded onto it, so they should likely be 4362a/b when they're done.
If we do call this one 3888a then x684c02 needs to move to 3888ac01, of course.
======================================================================
At Mon Jul 11 16:25:02 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
Just looked at Bricklink: http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItem.asp?P=x852c01
There it is mentioned that the number 4326 is seen in the mould. So I think that this file shows 4326!
I request to rename this to 4326.dat and the reference 4326c01.dat.
The other (new) part is listed as 3888c01 (http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItem.asp?P=3888c01). So I assume that the new mold without the hook is design id 3888.
I tried to verify against TLC but on the webside I can not find any hint for these parts.
======================================================================
At Thu Mar 8 22:45:06 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
This file is ready to go, if renumbered.
======================================================================
At Fri May 18 09:20:03 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
bumping this and its c01 assembly for renumbering
======================================================================
At Fri May 18 09:35:02 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
3888, 4326 or 4362 ??
======================================================================
At Fri May 18 13:30:04 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: dulcaoin
Certification: novote
Comments:
Chris, good question!
This is not 4326 or 4362. Those both have 12 studs in the long direction, and this part has 14. I believe that 4326 is a typo by someone at Bricklink, I'm fairly certain that the Mickey Mouse sets had the part with the design ID embossed.
All the references I have for 3888 have 14 studs, but also don't have an eye or a hook attached. If there was a re-moulded 3888, "a" should be the one without hook or eye.
So I would go with 3888b here. (3888a for the 14-stud without hook and eye).
======================================================================
At Fri May 18 13:35:04 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: dulcaoin
Certification: novote
Comments:
Whoops, I reversed what I should have said. Philo is right.
This should be 3888a. Without the hook and eye, 3888b (redesigned for sets 4164 and the 2002 LEGOLAND bus set).
======================================================================
At Fri May 18 14:16:36 2012 part 'parts/x684.dat' was renamed to 'parts/3888a.dat'.
======================================================================
At Sun Mar 10 20:05:05 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
Comments:
File name issue seems to be cleared.
======================================================================
At Sun Mar 10 20:50:03 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
Sorry, this part should get a (Needs Work) statement.
There are so many overlapping quads and t-junctions.
And the top sides of the mudguards bleeding through other surfaces.
======================================================================
At Sun Apr 14 16:20:06 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
I see some positioning/logic problems with this part.
tryout this test assembly
1 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3888ac01.dat
1 5 0 0 260 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 4796c01.dat
1 15 54 41 160 0 0 -1 0 1 0 1 0 0 4162.dat
1 14 -30 -24 160 0 0 -1 0 1 0 1 0 0 3008.dat
which was inspired by this assembly
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=5332975
the problems that can be seen here are:
(A) the tow hole and hook intersect
(B) the wheels of the trailer don't touch the ground
|
