Parts Tracker :: Parts List :: Activity :: Submit :: PT Tools :: PT Reference :: LDraw Specifications :: Lookup

Unofficial File parts/3865.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | View Diff | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

part image

File Header:

0 Baseplate  8 x 16
0 Name: 3865.dat
0 Author: James Jessiman
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CW

0 !HISTORY 2007-06-30 [PTadmin] Header formatted for Contributor Agreement
0 !HISTORY 2008-07-01 [PTadmin] Official Update 2008-01
0 !HISTORY 2011-12-18 [Steffen] BFCed, used stug

Status:
Certified! (ACCCF)
Size: 2257 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

MagFors=certify
Philo=certify
Steffen=novote
cwdee=certify
mikeheide=certify

Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)

Related (unofficial) files:
(none)

File reviews and updates:

At Sun Dec 18 05:55:04 2011, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
======================================================================
At Sun Dec 18 05:55:05 2011 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
======================================================================
At Sun Dec 18 06:00:07 2011, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
======================================================================
At Sun Dec 18 07:40:05 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
To proceed this file we have to decide the more detailed part.
http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/3865h.dat
My suggestion is:
Use this header and number and put the content of 3865h.dat here.

======================================================================
At Sun Dec 18 09:55:25 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
no, Mike, this file already had been official.
this is just an update.

the ...h variants appeared later on the PT,
and their appearance is not this part's fault,
please let this through,

the ...h decision can be done independently of this update...

======================================================================
At Sun Dec 18 10:55:05 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
Yes, this is just an update. That is true. But I think that this part in real looks like the h-variant. So why do an update on a part that is already out to build with without the - already done - best visual apperiance?
It should not be a big issue to solve the problems with the h-variants and integrate that in this file.

======================================================================
At Sun Dec 18 12:05:04 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
because that would create an inconsistent look -
currently no (flat) baseplate has a modeled underside...


======================================================================
At Sun Dec 18 17:15:04 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
As I do not see the need for the 3865h variant, I'll certify this.
There are many parts with a simplified design. eg. the "stud3.dat" is tube-shaped.
Do we realy need a "high resolution" version of all files?

======================================================================
At Sun Dec 18 19:00:09 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
I think that h versions are interesting, but shouldn't become standard since they are very polygon intensive (that's already the case of regular baseplates...). Maybe someday when there is a mechanism similar to lores studs to toggle?

======================================================================
At Sun Dec 18 20:20:03 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I also think that in future a switching mechanism could be added
which allows the user to toggle if baseplates should get underside
modeling etc. Until that has been decided, let's keep the current
status quo and pass this, please...

======================================================================
At Sun Dec 22 23:10:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
Mike, could you please lift your hold vote here?

======================================================================
At Mon Dec 23 11:00:10 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
mike, can you please lift your hold vote?
this baseplate follows the design of all others.
it is not this part's fault that parallelly a ...h variant has been created
which anyway needs a different approach and is held for that reason.

======================================================================
At Mon Dec 23 12:15:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
Comments:
Jepp.

======================================================================
At Thu Dec 26 08:05:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.


© 2001-2014 LDraw.org, see Legal Info for details. This website is powered by Peeron.com.

LEGO® is a registered trademark of the LEGO Group, which does not sponsor, endorse, or authorize this site. Visit the official Lego website at http://www.lego.com/.
The LDraw system is a completely unofficial, community run free CAD system which represents official parts produced by the LEGO company.
The LDraw Parts Tracker is maintained and developed by voluntary members of the LDraw organisation.