|
|
Unofficial File parts/3404b.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
Download |
Review |
Edit |
CA Header Edit |
Events
File Header:
0 ~Turntable 4 x 4 Dimpled Top
0 Name: 3404b.dat
0 Author: Guy Vivan [guyvivan]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !HISTORY 2004-10-16 [GuyVivan] Initial Version
0 !HISTORY 2012-11-05 [mikeheide] polished header, removed '(Old Style)' from description
0 !HISTORY 2012-11-06 [MMR1988] removed overlapping quads, introduce stud groups
0 !HISTORY 2012-12-08 [MMR1988] Partially recoding, adding missing faces.
Status:
 5 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSSSSX)
Size: 5614 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=certify
mikeheide=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) files:
File reviews and updates:
At Sun Sep 5 22:40:03 2004, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: guyvivan
======================================================================
At Wed Oct 13 14:34:02 2004, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: fwcain
Certification: novote
Comments:
Why the hard-colored Red and White sections?...
======================================================================
At Wed Oct 13 15:24:03 2004, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: guyvivan
Certification: novote
Comments:
Because it's reality !
My part is black with inner small cylinder red and a white "clip".
I can't better do! :o)
======================================================================
At Thu Oct 14 22:14:02 2004, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
Part name needs to be extended.
There are two variants of this part, one dimpled, one not.
See
http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/3404c01
http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/3404c02
This file is apparently the dimpled variant
======================================================================
At Thu Oct 14 22:58:01 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: guyvivan
Comments:
Corected extended part name
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Fri Oct 15 22:38:02 2004, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
?? I don't see a difference.
Both the dimpeled and un-dimpeled variants are "old style"
======================================================================
At Sat Oct 16 13:48:02 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: guyvivan
Comments:
Fixed title
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sun Oct 17 14:30:03 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: guyvivan
Comments:
Corected BFC 1-8cyli
======================================================================
At Sun Oct 17 14:40:01 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: guyvivan
======================================================================
At Sun Jul 9 12:36:07 2006, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: WilliamH
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Mon Oct 8 21:46:01 2007, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Mon Dec 21 22:11:43 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
"old" should be removed from part name.
(Each part at some point in time will become "old".)
We should find something more descriptive.
======================================================================
At Mon Feb 8 21:30:31 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
Comments:
Steffen, it would be very good if you have a better suggestion for your claim here.
======================================================================
At Tue Feb 9 11:20:25 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: guyvivan
Certification: novote
Comments:
We can replace "old" by "type 1" - "type 2" - etc...
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 19:35:08 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 20:30:08 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
There are overlapping rings on the top and on the bottom...
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 20:40:06 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
If they are plane to each other - this has been accepted back in 2004 where this part has been created. So I think we should not hold this file because we can improve it to make it perfect. It works like it is. IMHO.
======================================================================
At Tue Nov 6 21:45:04 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
I changed the rings and the studs.
And I removed one edgeline because you could see it from the topview. It is the one commented out. If it is OK, I will remove this line.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Tue Nov 6 21:45:05 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
Forgotten the history line
======================================================================
At Thu Nov 15 22:05:03 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I like to see that out commented ring-primitive put back.
Each "part" should carry its own edge lines.
If this half is made of three diffrently coloured pieces, isn't it too a shortcut?
Maybe they should have there own (unknown) partnumbers?
Or could they be moved to the main assembly?
======================================================================
At Sat Nov 17 09:30:04 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
Hold for the missing edgeline.
Please see also comments at 3404d
======================================================================
At Sat Nov 17 23:10:02 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
I will try to buy a such part in the next weeks. Then I will work on here.
======================================================================
At Sun Nov 18 13:42:55 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
(Needs Work) added.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Fri Dec 7 10:10:02 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Just a short update to the creation process:
I bought these parts. Now I try to find a way to disassemble it. Any ideas?
(I write this comment only to one subpart, because it's not really relevant for the certify process)
======================================================================
At Fri Dec 7 13:30:04 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
OK, I found a way to open this part without any damage. Now I know. The turntable consist of 4 parts. Don't wonder, if I'm not so present here in the next days. ;-) This seems to be a lot of work.
======================================================================
At Sun Dec 9 23:20:05 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
Here is the next one. I don't know, when I will upload the last one. Stupid real life ;-)
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Mon Jan 7 23:05:20 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Mon Apr 1 08:30:05 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
|
Needs more votes. (CX)