Unofficial File parts/3349p02.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events | 3349 Patterned parts

File Header:

0 Roadsign Rectangular Tall with Parking Pattern
0 Name: 3349p02.dat
0 Author: Steffen [Steffen]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CW

0 !HISTORY 2004-10-16 [cwdee] Add lines at top of post removed from 674s00

Status:
3 'hold' votes. (HHHX)
Size: 1945 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

Steffen=hold
cwdee=hold
fwcain=novote
mikeheide=hold
westrate=novote

Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)

Related (unofficial) files:
(none)

File reviews and updates:

At Fri Aug 1 14:00:06 2003, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
variant of 675p02.dat without "300m" pattern

======================================================================
At Wed Nov 5 16:26:02 2003, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: fwcain
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Sun Jun 6 14:30:04 2004, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: OrionP
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Sat Oct 16 06:54:03 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: cwdee
Comments:
Add lines at top of post removed from 674s00

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Thu Oct 21 01:36:01 2004, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: fwcain
Certification: novote
Comments:
For the Title, instead of "tall square" may I suggest "rectangle" or "rectangular"?...


======================================================================
At Thu Dec 28 09:08:03 2006, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
Comments:
Part is fine. If renunbered then 675p01 and 675 has also to be renamed.

======================================================================
At Tue Jul 7 21:04:03 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: westrate
Certification: novote
Comments:
Is this meant to be this part:
http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/675px1
?

If so, then the "P" is shaped wrong (serif font instead of sans serif). If not, can we get a picture to compare?

Otherwise, needs "Needs Work" because pattern is pixellated.

======================================================================
At Wed Jul 8 07:50:03 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
- there are two variants of this part, one with serif font
and one with non-serif font. the non-serif version can become
...p03 later. see http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/647px1
- the pattern is pixelated because I at the old days when creating
this file took it from ...p01. if this part gets a "needs work"
suffix, then ...p01 needs that also

anyone to improve the patterns to non-pixelated versions is of course
welcome, as well as submitting a ...p03 part with the non-serifed font pattern.

======================================================================
At Wed Jul 8 07:56:01 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
I just noticed that the image link from peeron
I posted above shows a roadsign of different size :-(, I'm sorry.

Will have to get to my collection to provide a real part image.

Voting hold until the issue "does this part have a serifed
or non-serifed "P" pattern?" is resolved.

======================================================================
At Fri Oct 16 06:54:02 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: hold
Comments:
Peeron image shows a sans-serif "P"
http://media.peeron.com/pics/inv/custpics/675px1.jpg


======================================================================
At Sun Apr 25 13:44:05 2010 part 'parts/675p02.dat' was renamed to 'parts/3349p02.dat'.
======================================================================
At Tue Apr 27 16:00:06 2010, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
This is just a derivated work of http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?f=parts/3349p01.dat what is definitely wrong. Please see first comment from submission.