|
|
Unofficial File parts/32482.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
Download |
Review |
Edit |
CA Header Edit |
Events
File Header:
0 Technic Liftarm 1 x 7 bent with 2 Ball Joints
0 Name: 32482.dat
0 Author: Robert Sexton [rhsexton]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
Status:
 2 subfiles aren't certified. (CCSSX)
Size: 301 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=novote
SirBugge=novote
Steffen=novote
arezey=novote
cwdee=novote
fwcain=certify
mikeheide=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) files:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Sat Dec 14 21:34:06 2002, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Valemar
Comments:
bionicle limb
======================================================================
At Thu Jan 23 04:48:06 2003, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: sbliss
Certification: hold
Comments:
Part files may not include 0 WRITE meta-statements. These lines need to be removed from this file.
======================================================================
At Sat Jul 5 13:00:01 2003, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
removed WRITE statements, formatted header to comply with standards,
added spaces before numbers in part name.
checked with L3P: no errors
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Wed Jul 30 13:00:03 2003, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
missing edges, e.g. at this quad
4 16 -10 -5.3044 36.4692 -10 -0.6849 34.5557 -10 -2.6361 31.6361 -10 -6.1716 35.1716
======================================================================
At Wed Dec 10 23:10:04 2003, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
I additionally suggest 48ing the spheres
======================================================================
At Wed Mar 3 04:22:05 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: millennium359
Comments:
replaced the ball-joints with 48's
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Wed Mar 3 17:24:16 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: millennium359
Comments:
rebuilt using sub-parts
======================================================================
At Thu Mar 4 14:46:09 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: millennium359
Comments:
added "s\" to sub-part references
======================================================================
At Fri Mar 5 23:52:01 2004, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: fwcain
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Sun Mar 14 15:06:08 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
re-submitting to repair broken PT image
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sun Mar 14 18:18:15 2004, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: fwcain
Certification: certify
Comments:
> re-submitting to repair broken PT image
For future use, this is not necessary;
instead, you can do a "hard refresh" (Ctl+F5) on your browser.
======================================================================
At Tue Sep 7 19:14:04 2004, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: SirBugge
Certification: novote
Comments:
Here's a long list:
1 The files are huge! - Too many triangles and quads: Convert trinagles to quads and use some more primitives (among others, larm's and rings)
2 Please try to finish one section of the file before moving to another: All those lines in the middle of the file is really confusing!
3 a lot of edges is missing, especially around the hydraulic tubes.
4 I can't see you achieve anything by parting the part up in submodels that way: If you split it up down the middle in stead, you could mirror it and get near 50% reduction.
5 What about BFC'ing
6 lastly, I'd suggest that you use the balljoint from my part s\41670s04.dat as it is more precise and 1/7 the size.
Is this file free for all?
======================================================================
At Sat Jan 28 09:24:03 2006, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Sat Jan 23 18:46:51 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
Robert Sexton has not affirmed the CA
======================================================================
At Sat Jul 17 21:05:02 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
Robert Sexton as [rhsexton] has now affirmed the CA.
======================================================================
At Sun Oct 24 09:10:05 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Sat Nov 22 20:40:01 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
I think "Technic Bionicle Leg 1 x 7 Bent with 2 Ball Joints" would make a better part so as to match with other leg parts.
======================================================================
At Sat Nov 22 22:55:00 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
Looks like a fun challenge. I'll start working.
======================================================================
At Sun Nov 23 11:45:01 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Do you have this part, Santeri? I don't, and it is not present in LDD.
I find the basic geometry of it very confusing.
It is called '1 x 7' but if I meassure it, it's more like '1.5 x 6'
If the first ball is at 0 0 -40, then the second is at 0 30.214 81.887
And why is official part 32173 called '...Liftarm 2 x 7 ...'?
It has the ball joints at '1 x 5'.
How are Bionical Legs meassured, and is this design correct?
Maybe I bit of more than I can chew.
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 24 18:30:00 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I've now reworked 32173 and sent it to Admin.
I still need help understanding the position of the second ball here. Please?
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 24 21:30:00 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
I don't have it at hand ATM, I'm living in an apartment nowadays and the lego parts are at home which I'll get to visit in 3 weeks.
It seems mostly correct to me, though I cannot verify that it's exactly where it should be at.
======================================================================
At Tue Nov 25 14:40:00 2014, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
I can rework this part in mid December when I get to visit home.
======================================================================
At Thu Feb 26 01:15:00 2015, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
should get BFCed
|
2 'hold' votes. (HHX)