Unofficial File parts/32333.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

File Header:

0 Technic Block Connector  5 x  3 x  1 (Cylinder housing)
0 Name: 32333.dat
0 Author: Eelco Kooiker and Marc Klein
0 Created with stl2dat conversion tool
0 Un-Official LCad part

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 // 2004-05-15 GuyVivan Made BFC compliant & Move 0 Origine
0 // 2005-07-24          Add Missing edge

Status:
1 'hold' vote. (CCHX)
Size: 23716 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

Philo=certify
Steffen=hold
WilliamH=certify
arezey=novote
mikeheide=novote

Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)

Related (unofficial) files:
(none)

File reviews and updates:

At Fri Sep 14 21:50:02 2001, the file was initially submitted.
======================================================================
At Sat Nov 3 13:08:02 2001, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: wjwood
Certification: certify
Comments:
Part name should be 'Technic Connector Block 5 x 3 x 1' so it sorts with the other Technic Connector Blocks.

See http://www.peeron.com/inv/parts/32333

Also, file size could be reduced by using PEGHOLE.DAT primitives. This would also improve POV renderings.


======================================================================
At Mon May 6 23:56:03 2002, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: OrionP
Certification: certify
Comments:
The cylindar primitve usesage in this part seems to be inconsistant. For instance, in the middle of the part, two of the cylindars use primitives and two don't (as evidenced by the use of primitive substiution in LDView). While the part on the whole looks good the use of primitives as appropriate would please the part author side of me.

======================================================================
At Thu May 30 19:48:03 2002, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: BrickCaster
Certification: novote
Comments:
I agree, more cylinder primitives could be used

======================================================================
At Sat Sep 6 01:36:01 2003, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mkennedy
Certification: novote
Comments:
You need to use peghole primitves.
And in many places you have several quads where a rect primitve would work better.

======================================================================
At Sat Sep 6 02:12:01 2003, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mkennedy
Certification: novote
Comments:
Also you could make use of 2-4ndis primitves in the lower half.

======================================================================
At Thu Oct 23 16:12:01 2003, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: fwcain
Certification: novote
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Tue Mar 23 19:40:03 2004, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: westrate
Certification: hold
Comments:
Holding for non-coplanar quads


======================================================================
At Sun May 16 00:26:03 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: guyvivan
Comments:
Made BFC Compliant
Modify 0 Origine
Use peghole, cylinder, ring, rect, box, ndis primitive.
Del all quads and triangles and recreate it.
Del multi line and replace by only one.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Tue May 18 03:22:02 2004, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mkennedy
Certification: novote
Comments:
Looks good, Much better than the previous version. Though you do have some overlapping quads near the outermost peg holes.

======================================================================
At Tue May 18 17:42:02 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: guyvivan
Comments:
Corrected overlapping quads near the outermost peg holes.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Thu Jun 10 20:04:04 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: guyvivan
Comments:
Add edge on three stud3a under side (intersection with cylinder)

======================================================================
At Sat Jun 12 11:34:03 2004, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mkennedy
Certification: certify
Comments:
Looks good to me!

======================================================================
At Sun Jun 13 19:46:02 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: guyvivan
Comments:
Improve detail near base three cylinders with peghole.
(use 2-4ring8 and mod quads between cylinders).

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Wed Oct 6 19:30:01 2004, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: fwcain
Certification: novote
Comments:
I don't have this part. It looks good, however...


======================================================================
At Sun Jul 24 14:44:08 2005, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
outer edgeline on the top missing at third hole at bottom from behind.

======================================================================
At Sun Jul 24 16:40:05 2005, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: guyvivan
Comments:
Add missing edge.
Good look...

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Mon Jul 25 19:40:03 2005, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
Is it ok for parts that the cylinder ends not at the next surface? I saw some conditional lines interal at the part where they normaly are not needed. By investigating more into the part I then saw that you used given primitives where I normaly would model with quads to exaxtly match the ends of all surfaces.

======================================================================
At Sun Feb 26 18:40:03 2006, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Thu Jul 13 19:10:02 2006, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: WilliamH
Certification: novote
Comments:
overlapping rings and quads

======================================================================
At Sat Aug 19 21:17:15 2006, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: WilliamH
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Tue May 12 19:54:05 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Perhaps should be retitled, too, as it's mainly used to make an engine, so it should be titled similarly to the other engine parts!

I'm suggesting "Technic Engine End Housing", or something similar. I'm not really too good in making up names! connector and block, if not in the title then, should be keyworded.

======================================================================
At Tue May 12 20:06:01 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
Peeron calls this "Technic Engine Block 1 x 5 x 3"

======================================================================
At Sun Aug 29 20:40:07 2010, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I suggest removing "cylinder housing" from title.
Technically the part seems fine to me otherwise.

======================================================================
At Fri Jan 14 00:20:02 2011, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
header needs cleanup