|
|
Unofficial File parts/30342.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
Download |
Review |
Edit |
CA Header Edit |
Events
File Header:
0 Rock Arctic Globe, Bottom
0 Name: 30342.dat
0 Author: Stan Isachenko [angmarec]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !CATEGORY Sphere
0 !HISTORY 2012-11-04 {LEGO Digital Designer} Original part shape
0 !HISTORY 2012-11-04 Stan Isachenko [angmarec] File preparation for LDraw Parts Tracker
0 BFC INVERTNEXT
Status:
 1 'hold' vote. (HX)
Size: 149628 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MMR1988=novote
MagFors=hold
Philo=novote
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) files:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Sun Nov 4 14:35:09 2012, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: angmarec
======================================================================
At Sun Nov 4 18:45:07 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
I am waiting for the top to certify both then.
======================================================================
At Sun Nov 4 19:20:08 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Looks good overall. What I don't understand is why do you have so many triangles to join top stud2 to rock structure? The T-junctions prevents proper smoothing...
======================================================================
At Sun Nov 4 20:20:04 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: angmarec
Certification: novote
Comments:
I think it is possible to rework inner surface. But I'm not sure about primitives.
======================================================================
At Sun Nov 4 20:35:04 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
You could do it with ring-primitives for example.
Maybe it's possible to use cone-primitives for the inside side area.
And I don't like the underside design, you could use 1-4chrd in each corner and fill the rest of the area with normal quads.
And another thing: I don't have this part, but is the underside really asymmetric?
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 11:35:02 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: angmarec
Comments:
I don't know what to do with ring, in LDView it looks with gaps((
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 12:10:02 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
You could do it in this way for example:
1 16 0 -44 0 1.045455 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1.045455 48\4-4rin33.dat
1 16 0 -44 0 0.807851 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.807851 48\4-4rin44.dat
1 16 0 -44 0 0.741904 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.741904 48\4-4rin49.dat
1 16 0 -44 0 0.650793 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.650793 48\4-4rin57.dat
1 2 0 -44 0 37.746 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 37.746 48\4-4aring.dat
4-4aring is for the connection between 48-sided and 16-sided circular primitives.
Attention(!) at the moment there is no 48\4-4rin57.dat primitiv available, this must be created first. (The easiest way for this is using PrimGen2)
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 14:10:05 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: angmarec
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 14:35:03 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
You need at least one 4-4aring.dat for connect 48 to 16-sided primitives.
For getting possible ring-combinations you can use the program "rings and cones". You can find it at Philo's homepage.
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 17:30:15 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: angmarec
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 17:35:04 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Just add these lines:
1 16 0 -7.2 0 0.162162 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.162162 4-4rin37.dat
1 16 0 -7.2 0 0.162162 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.162162 4-4rin38.dat
1 16 0 -7.2 0 0.103677 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0.103677 4-4rin61.dat
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 17:55:03 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: angmarec
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 18:05:03 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
Line 58 and 59 do have 48primitive that is not correct here. Please substitude by the following lines:
1 16 0 -44 0 1 0 0 0 5.25 0 0 0 1 4-4rin36.dat
1 16 0 -44 0 1 0 0 0 5.25 0 0 0 1 4-4rin37.dat
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 18:15:05 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: angmarec
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 18:25:02 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
Sorry i should have mention it in my previous comment.
The four boxes outside needs edgelines where they meet the cylinder.
Otherwise looks very good so far.
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 18:30:05 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: angmarec
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 19:50:03 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Looks good! I would further simplify the junction between torus and stud, using a single wider ring that goes slightly under stud. The resuld would probably be nicer (better smooth shading).
I think you should use the same torus+disk for the upper globe.
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 5 20:20:29 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
The looks better and better ;-)
Using a single disc between torus and stud is a good idea.
I'm not sure, if a torus at the outside will cause in a collision with the hollows.
Please do not scale the 2D-primitives in y-dimension (line 55-58)
And another thing: is here somebody, who can confirm, that the round corners of the underside area are really asymmetric?
======================================================================
At Wed Nov 7 21:15:16 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:
The overall height isn't correct. This part should be 1.667 brick high.
Together they should just fit inside this mock-up:
1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 30342.dat
1 9 0 -40 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 30286.dat
1 4 20 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3032.dat
1 4 50 -24 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3005.dat
1 14 50 -32 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3024.dat
1 14 50 -40 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3024.dat
1 4 50 -64 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3005.dat
1 14 50 -72 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3024.dat
1 14 50 -80 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3024.dat
1 4 20 -88 10 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3666.dat
Why is one half made with lo-res primitives, and the other in hi-res?
Flat primitives should not be scaled in all dimensions.
|
Certified! (ACCX)