Unofficial File parts/3009ptc.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
CA Header Edit |
| 3009 Patterned parts
0 Brick 1 x 6 with "GENOVA" on White Background Pattern
0 Name: 3009ptc.dat
0 Author: J.C. Tchang [tchang]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !HISTORY 2011-06-10 [tchang] Change title
1 'hold' vote. (HX)
Size: 13548 bytes
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) files:
File reviews and updates:
At Sat Mar 12 05:45:07 2011, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: tchang
3009pb019 Bricklink, 3009px19 Peeron
At Sun May 1 09:40:04 2011, the following review was posted:
I do not like the current title
"...on White Box Pattern"
very much. I wondered why and found that that's because of our primitives, I associate a 3D object with "box".
What about changing title to
"...on White Background Pattern"
At Sat May 28 09:35:10 2011, the following review was posted:
does an inverted version of this pattern exist as well?
maybe you want to subfile the positive and negative portion
of the pattern to share it between the positive and negative
version of this pattern?
At Sat Jun 11 06:55:08 2011, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: tchang
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
At Sat Jun 11 08:30:06 2011, the following review was posted:
At http://www.ldraw.org/cgi-bin/ptdetail.cgi?s=3009pt3.dat ,
you have explained how you have created the letter "G":
you rendered it normally from the font and then distorted it manually.
You wanted to make it match your real part instance better this way.
However, I think that the instance you have has a small printing error,
where during the print process ink flowed around a little,
so the "G" received a glitch. I think that we should not model such
glitches. We also do not model dents in the bricks, patterns which
are not perfectly horizontal, scratches or moulding relicts.
Now, some of the 1x6 bricks with patterns need attention due to this:
it looks to me that in
, you have manually undone the "G" manipulation. However, the G now
looks "manipulated". I think you should re-render it from the font cleanly.
This is why I am holding those 2 parts.
Differently, the files
still contain the "G distortion manipulation", and that way their "G"
in the pattern looks different than 3009pt12.dat, 3009pt13.dat.
This breaks systematics, which is why I am holding those.
I suggest to re-render the "G" from the font cleanly here as well.
At Sun Jun 12 14:49:25 2011 part 'parts/3009pt12.dat' was renamed to 'parts/3009ptc.dat'.