|
|
Unofficial File parts/2996.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
Download |
Review |
Edit |
CA Header Edit |
Events
File Header:
0 Wheel 68.8 x 40 Q
0 Name: 2996.dat
0 Author: Marc Klein [mklein]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !HISTORY 2004-11-15 [SEB] BFC'ed, inlined subfile, used more primitives.
0 !HISTORY 2010-04-03 [Philo] Rebuilt center
Status:
 1 subfile isn't certified. (CCSX)
Size: 11826 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=certify
Philo=novote
Steffen=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) files:
File reviews and updates:
At Sat Oct 13 00:00:02 2001, the file was initially submitted.
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 26 06:50:01 2001, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: pneaster
Certification: certify
Comments:
Looks ok, except that the inside surface seems to be missing from the back side of the wheel, I believe this is in subpart s\6595c.dat
======================================================================
At Sun Jun 16 11:18:04 2002, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: cschmitz
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 15 19:44:02 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: sbliss
Comments:
I rewrote s/2996s.dat to use all primitives (using mostly existing primitives - I broke down and created 48/1-4con12.dat), then inlined s/2996s into the main file. Unfortunately, the 6595 subfiles used by 2996.dat need some improvements. So I'll update those files next, and submit them when ready.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 15 20:12:01 2004, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: guyvivan
Certification: novote
Comments:
Missing cylinder between four s\6595c.dat and inner 2996.dat !!!
======================================================================
At Mon Nov 15 20:28:02 2004, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: sbliss
Certification: hold
Comments:
Yep, the missing cylinder walls are part of what needs to be fixed in the 6595 subfiles.
======================================================================
At Wed Nov 17 19:14:02 2004, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: sbliss
Certification: hold
Comments:
This part is about 10LDU too long in the Z dimension.
======================================================================
At Wed Nov 17 19:18:01 2004, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: sbliss
Certification: hold
Comments:
Doh, never mind that last comment - I've got too many wheel parts floating around here, and I was looking at the wrong one.
======================================================================
At Fri Nov 19 14:56:01 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: sbliss
Comments:
I changed the interior cylinder to reduce the problem with the missing interior surfaces.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Fri Nov 19 15:06:01 2004, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: sbliss
Certification: hold
Comments:
While I was working on fixing the issues with this part, I realized that there are physical differences between the core of part 6595 and the core of 2996. So using subpart files from 6595 in 2996 won't work.
The differences I noticed include:
- the crossaxle hole in 2996 has 4 teeth, instead of 2
- the crossaxle hole in 6595 (and some other wheels) is large; once an axle is inserted, there are visible gaps. The crossaxle hole in 2996 is relatively small/tight.
- the backside of the crossaxle hub on 2996 is notched like the technic bushing. So it could be mounted on a 2x2 brick.
- the frontside of the crossaxle hub has an extra indent around the crossaxle hub.
- the cutout holes around the 6 pegholes are slightly smaller. The holes in 6595 will accomodate a pin joiner, the holes in 2996 will not. The difference is pretty small, and both parts would probably model these holes with radius=10LDU.
======================================================================
At Fri Nov 19 15:25:39 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: sbliss
Comments:
This is a test of the file-submission subsystem.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Fri Nov 19 15:28:01 2004, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: sbliss
Certification: hold
Comments:
Re-establishing hold, after previous test-submit.
======================================================================
At Sat Apr 3 12:55:07 2010, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Rebuilt center
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Wed Jan 25 08:40:02 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Bump!
======================================================================
At Wed Jan 25 09:40:05 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
What does the "Q" in the title mean?
======================================================================
At Wed Jan 25 10:20:04 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I guess it comes from tire grade... should probably be renamed. Suggestions? (thickness is 30mm, overall diameter 43.2mm)
======================================================================
At Tue May 1 13:50:03 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Wed Aug 1 17:00:06 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
Comments:
Only needs a standardized name.
|
Needs admin review. (CCX)