Parts Tracker :: Parts List :: Activity :: Submit :: PT Tools :: PT Reference :: LDraw Specifications :: Lookup

Unofficial File parts/2515b.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

part image

File Header:

0 Wheel 32 x 56 Hard-Plastic with Inner Supports
0 Name: 2515b.dat
0 Author: Jude Parrill [theJudeAbides]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !KEYWORDS Large

0 // Pin Hole

0 BFC INVERTNEXT

Status:
Certified! (ACCCX)
Size: 2778 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

MMR1988=certify
Philo=certify
cwdee=certify
mikeheide=certify

Required (unofficial) subfiles:

parts/s/2515s01.dat

~Wheel 32 x 56 Hard-Plastic - 1/12

Certified! (ACCCX)

Events

parts/s/2515s02.dat

~Wheel 32 x 56 Hard-Plastic - Inner Support

Certified! (ACCX)

Events

Related (unofficial) files:

parts/4504602.dat

_Wheel 32 x 56 Hard-Plastic with Inner Supports [25]

Needs more votes. (X)

Events

File reviews and updates:

At Wed Apr 14 17:58:03 2004, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: jediknight219
Comments:
Should be good to go, based to Wheel Hard-Plastic Giant

======================================================================
At Wed Apr 14 19:00:04 2004, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: sbliss
Certification: hold
Comments:
Good work on your first part. However, the studs are misplaced; they should be at Y=10 and Y=-10, not 8 and -8. And the whole part needs to be rotated 90 degrees. The standard orientation for tyres/wheels is to make the axleline coincide with the Z-axis.

I did not check this part against the real element, nor did I try to use it in an LDraw model with other parts.

======================================================================
At Wed Apr 14 22:16:03 2004, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: jediknight219
Comments:
Thanks for the tips. I fixed the studs, rotated the piece, renamed the subpart and changed the description on the subpart. Now how do I remove the old subpart file?

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Fri Apr 23 14:00:03 2004, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: bbroich
Certification: novote
Comments:
no BFC Statement
bad vertex sequences at lines 44, 50 and 51


======================================================================
At Sat Apr 24 12:20:02 2004, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
bowtie quads confirmed

======================================================================
At Sat Nov 17 20:52:03 2007, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Thu Jun 17 20:25:04 2010, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
has gaps

======================================================================
At Sat Jan 4 10:10:06 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
Maybe we should recreate this file using the current LDD-Team data.

======================================================================
At Sun Jan 5 06:20:03 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: theJudeAbides
Comments:
IT'S BEEN RE-FORGED!!!
Sorry, but this bad-boy took me a while.

I started working on this part last year. After looking at just how bad a shape the original file was in, I decided to re-create this from scratch. But then, after my first try, I was dissatisified with how the corner area came out (particularly where it transitions from the smaller radius to the larger radius). At this point, I'd grown a bit burnt out from this part, so I took a break (much longer than I really wanted to). Recently, I decided to give it another go, and I'm much happier with the way that area turned out this time.

I've put a LOT of time into this part, and I think it shows. I'm quite proud of all I've accomplished with this part.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 5 08:05:01 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
Comments:
Looks much better.

======================================================================
At Sun Jan 5 10:45:05 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
In my eyes this is version b...
The 2515 on my desk doesn't have inner supports...

======================================================================
At Sun Jan 5 11:05:02 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
Ah, now I know what you mean (http://www.bricklink.com/catalogItemPic.asp?P=2515)
Should not be too complicate :)
So this file should be uploaded as 2515b.dat and without the supports as 2515a.dat.
Sounds good. Happy submitting :)

======================================================================
At Sun Jan 5 11:15:13 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Furthermore I would suggest to use our wheel naming scheme here. There are small, large and giants versions... That's a bit confusing, I think...

======================================================================
At Sun Jan 5 11:20:03 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
There is also an LDD version of this part :) maybe that helps for the details?

======================================================================
At Sun Jan 5 12:00:12 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: hold
Comments:

2515a.dat "Wheel 32 x 56 Hard-Plastic without Inner Supports" and keyword "Large"
2515b.dat "Wheel 32 x 56 Hard-Plastic with Inner Supports" and keyword "Large"

2593.dat "Wheel 30 x 35 Hard-Plastic" and keyword "Medium"
2573.dat "Wheel 48 x 76 Hard-Plastic" and keyword "Gigant"

This might be a total rework, but what happened with the header?
Original author is John Boozer [jediknight219], right?




======================================================================
At Mon Jan 6 16:35:04 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: theJudeAbides
Comments:
OK, it's been re-named as per the discussion. I didn't resubmit as 2515b because I didn't want to clutter up the PT when Chris can rename this easily.
So Chris, will you do the honors?

And Magfors, the reason I didn't credit jediknight219 is because I completely started over from scratch, using measurements I took from my own part, using absolutely none of his work. I assumed this was akin to way back when we recreated parts that non-CA people had authored. Since we did it ourselves seperate of the previous work, there was no need/reason to credity them. If I'm off-base here, I can add a history comment, but I don't think that I am.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Mon Jan 6 18:40:55 2014 part 'parts/2515.dat' was renamed to 'parts/2515b.dat'.
======================================================================
At Mon Jan 6 18:45:03 2014 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
======================================================================
At Mon Jan 6 19:45:06 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
I see gaps between the segments.

======================================================================
At Mon Jan 6 20:05:03 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
Gaps confirmed, please my whole comment at 2515a. Thanks!

======================================================================
At Tue Jan 7 08:40:06 2014, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: theJudeAbides
Comments:
Parts fixed. See my comment on the ...a version for more info.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Tue Jan 7 09:15:05 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: certify
Comments:
Just for the record: in the inner rings, you put the normal to highres aring adapter inside most of the rings. It's better to put it outside and keep normal res rings as much as possible to minimize number of facets.

======================================================================
At Tue Jan 7 10:55:03 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Tue Jan 7 16:50:05 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
Comments:
Great Job!!

======================================================================
At Wed Jan 8 18:45:04 2014 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
======================================================================
At Wed Jan 8 18:45:04 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.


© 2001-2014 LDraw.org, see Legal Info for details. This website is powered by Peeron.com.

LEGO® is a registered trademark of the LEGO Group, which does not sponsor, endorse, or authorize this site. Visit the official Lego website at http://www.lego.com/.
The LDraw system is a completely unofficial, community run free CAD system which represents official parts produced by the LEGO company.
The LDraw Parts Tracker is maintained and developed by voluntary members of the LDraw organisation.