Parts Tracker :: Parts List :: Activity :: Submit :: PT Tools :: PT Reference :: LDraw Specifications :: Lookup

Unofficial File parts/22631.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

part image

File Header:

0 Technic RoboRider Container Lid (Needs Work)
0 Name: 22631.dat
0 Author: Michael Heidemann [mikeheide]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !HISTORY 2006-04-19 [mikeheide] initial version
0 !HISTORY 2006-04-20 [mikeheide] added details
0 !HISTORY 2006-04-20 [mikeheide] BFCed and added missing rings

0 // All decorations are missing (inside and outside)

Status:
Needs more votes. (X)
Size: 4258 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

dulcaoin=novote
mikeheide=novote

Required (unofficial) subfiles:

p/48/4-4con25.dat

Hi-Res Cone 25 x 1.0

Certified! (ACCX)

Events

p/48/4-4con52.dat

Hi-Res Cone 52 x 1.0

Certified! (ACCX)

Events

p/48/t01o0200.dat

Hi-Res Torus Outside 1 x 0.0200 x 1

Certified! (ACCX)

Events

Related (unofficial) files:
(none)

File reviews and updates:

At Wed Apr 19 21:06:02 2006, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
I did not found the correct part no or description for this part in the internet. So I created it by myself. Any comments are welcome and if the right part no is found the admin may change the number.

======================================================================
At Thu Apr 20 16:36:43 2006, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: dulcaoin
Certification: novote
Comments:
My notes show the lid as having item number 4125869, but that would be in a hard-coded color. The lid should have such a number embossed on it, most likely.

======================================================================
At Thu Apr 20 18:38:11 2006, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
BFD'ed and added missing rings. I have checked all 6 lidwheels but there is no id no on that parts. There is only a 2 charater no like "C6" or "A6" etc. I think that this is the molding because some has the same no.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Thu Apr 20 19:56:05 2006, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
======================================================================
At Mon Jan 5 17:06:19 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
filename doesn't match current policies

======================================================================
At Sat Jan 31 18:16:04 2009 part 'parts/lidwheel.dat' was renamed to 'parts/x528.dat'.
======================================================================
At Sat Jan 31 20:36:11 2009, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
thanks for renaming

======================================================================
At Fri Jan 6 11:05:03 2012, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
added missing !HISTORY keywords, corrected header

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 8 21:35:05 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: tcobbs
Certification: hold
Comments:
A Mockup (as indicated in the description) shouldn't ever be released. If it's "good enough", but not perfect, (Mockup) can be changed to (Needs work), at which point it's fine to release. I don't have the part, so have no idea if it's "good enough". If so, and admin can edit the description to be (Needs work), and I'll change this to a novote.

======================================================================
At Sun Jan 8 21:45:06 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I agree. Mockups should only be temporary placeholders on the PT
until someone submits the real stuff.

======================================================================
At Sun Aug 26 07:55:02 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
All fuctional details are modelled. Only the decoration stuff is missing. So it might be a good idea to change "mockup" to "needs work".

======================================================================
At Mon Aug 27 07:10:04 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Agreed, should be promted to "needs work" state...

======================================================================
At Mon Aug 27 13:35:04 2012 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
======================================================================
At Mon Aug 27 16:05:05 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: tcobbs
Certification: novote
Comments:
Hold removed after admin header edit.

======================================================================
At Tue Aug 28 13:15:04 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: dulcaoin
Certification: novote
Comments:
4125869 turns out to be only one of quite a few item IDs for the roborider lids. In this case, the red one. Each color also has a unique design ID as well so there is no generic ID to use to represent the lid in general. The cans are the same way. Fun trivia fact: there was a transparent can, but it was never released.

======================================================================
At Tue Aug 28 19:45:03 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
we then can use an u.....dat number

======================================================================
At Tue Aug 28 20:30:05 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
... or leave it with the existing xNNN number x528, which will become 528 upon release.

======================================================================
At Tue Aug 28 23:35:02 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
sometimes, the idea comes to my mind to simply
renumber all remaining x....dat files still on the PT to u.....dat.

The annoyance that a file loses its "x" on release
each time is painful to me, because I have to search my unofficial
files for both the x-prefixed x.......dat *and* the x-unprefixed
........dat incarnation.

Our new u......dat mechanism is by far more elegant
(which includes "simpler").

======================================================================
At Wed Aug 29 13:15:02 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: dulcaoin
Certification: novote
Comments:
Use 22631 for the lid. 22328 for the can, if anyone ever gets to it. If additional specific colors get done, those will be different numbers.

======================================================================
At Wed Aug 29 17:18:42 2012 part 'parts/x528.dat' was renamed to 'parts/22631.dat'.
======================================================================
At Sat Dec 29 21:35:02 2012, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Fri Mar 15 19:25:11 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
Anybody else has an opinion to get this file out?

======================================================================
At Sat Mar 16 06:35:01 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
In my eyes this part needs a needs work description.
The ribs should be reworked and I don't know where the part number is taken from.

======================================================================
At Sat Mar 16 08:20:04 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Comments:
Added needs work description.
I liked to link to a picture here, but I could not find one on the net?
That's curious because this part is also used in instructions!
See: http://belay.peeron.com/pdf/8513-1/1/ last page.

Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sat Mar 16 09:15:04 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
Ok, i did some quick pictures, so you can see what this should look like.
http://ldraw.heidemann.org/tmp/Picture%207.jpg
http://ldraw.heidemann.org/tmp/Picture%208.jpg
http://ldraw.heidemann.org/tmp/Picture%209.jpg

======================================================================
At Sat Mar 16 14:25:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: dulcaoin
Certification: novote
Comments:
The part number comes from database info, you won't see it embossed on the part.

======================================================================
At Sun Dec 29 10:05:07 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
bump


© 2001-2014 LDraw.org, see Legal Info for details. This website is powered by Peeron.com.

LEGO® is a registered trademark of the LEGO Group, which does not sponsor, endorse, or authorize this site. Visit the official Lego website at http://www.lego.com/.
The LDraw system is a completely unofficial, community run free CAD system which represents official parts produced by the LEGO company.
The LDraw Parts Tracker is maintained and developed by voluntary members of the LDraw organisation.