|
|
Unofficial File parts/194325ac01.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
Download |
Review |
Edit |
CA Header Edit |
Events
File Header:
0 Sticker Slope 33 3 x 10 w White/Red/Blue Stripes Pattern (Bent)
0 Name: 194325ac01.dat
0 Author: Steffen [Steffen]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Shortcut
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 !HELP 1 14 -60 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3297.dat
0 !HELP 1 14 20 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3297.dat
0 !HELP 1 14 80 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3298.dat
0 BFC CERTIFY CW
0 !HISTORY 2004-01-28 [cwdee] Removed POV code per LSC decision
0 !HISTORY 2009-06-10 [Steffen] recreated to model scalloping using philo's intersector tool
Status:
 2 'hold' votes. (HHSSX)
Size: 3225 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
Steffen=hold
mikeheide=hold
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
Related (unofficial) files:
(none)
File reviews and updates:
At Thu Jun 11 22:44:04 2009, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
see s3.dat
======================================================================
At Thu Jun 11 22:56:07 2009, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
removed "white" from part name
as color 16 is used for versatility
======================================================================
At Fri Jun 12 00:04:01 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
I am sorry, but as this is a sticker it is not allowed to use color 16. Please see here: http://www.ldraw.org/Article339.html
======================================================================
At Fri Jun 12 08:12:03 2009, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
(just for completeness: according to that document,
some stickers are allowed to use color 16),
however, this one is not transparent
--> replaced color 16 by white
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Fri Jun 12 14:52:01 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
White should also be mentioned in the part description.
======================================================================
At Fri Jun 12 19:40:05 2009, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
added "white" to part name
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Fri Jun 12 20:34:03 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Sat Jun 13 06:08:02 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Example lines
0 1 14 -60 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3297.dat
0 1 14 20 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3297.dat
0 1 14 80 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3298.dat
should be put in a !help section
======================================================================
At Sat Jun 13 10:08:07 2009, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
put alignment helpers into !HELP section
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sat Jun 13 12:12:07 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Sat Jun 13 15:50:10 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: novote
Comments:
Needs to be renumbered, but the Parts Tracker doesn't currently support long filenames - 194325ac01 would be preferred.
======================================================================
At Sat Jun 13 15:54:02 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
We could use filename 194325ac.dat
as I don't expect a c02 to appear here.
Later, a MOVED-TO ...c01 could be done.
======================================================================
At Sat Oct 31 11:26:04 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
Admin, please rename to 194325ac.dat
as this is the formed version of sticker 194325a.dat
======================================================================
At Wed Apr 28 03:00:04 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
Chris, could you rename this file now that the PT can handle its long filename?
======================================================================
At Wed Apr 28 07:52:04 2010 part 'parts/s3c01.dat' was renamed to 'parts/194325ac01.dat'.
======================================================================
At Wed Apr 28 16:25:02 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
this my baby is now ready for CERT IMHO, someone have mercy with it
======================================================================
At Fri May 7 01:05:03 2010, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
Changed Unofficial_Shortcut to Unofficial_Part.
This should have two effects:
(a) an algorithm that adds "seams" between adjacent parts
this way will _not_ add a seam between the two files that make up this one
(b) this expresses that this is not an assembly of different parts,
but a "bent" sticker
point (a) is more important
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Fri May 7 01:05:04 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
(c) The part gets properly BFC-displayed in LDView
Otherwise, it does not.
======================================================================
At Fri May 7 08:10:03 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
While I do agree about classification of this as part (as per point b), I don't see any effect described in points a or c. What version of LDview do you use?
======================================================================
At Fri May 7 17:50:03 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
You can reproduce (c) by using this part in an MLCad model file.
That model file must not contain a BFC statement itself.
Then, all BFCed parts in it will be displayed green.
However, this file only in the case that its type is "part", not "shortcut".
The scenario (a) is just of preventional nature.
I imagined an algorithm for scaling down parts a small bit
to emulate "gaps"/"seams" between them like l3d does it.
I was wondering when this algorithm would decide to add a gap
and figured that such an algorithm wouldn't have a chance
of doing its work correctly if this is a shortcut, not a part.
======================================================================
At Fri May 7 18:10:06 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Thanks. As for gap, there is no reason since it is made from subparts, not parts. Dunno for BFC. Maybe ask Travis?
======================================================================
At Fri May 7 19:55:13 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
Philo, you are perfectly right:
Such an algorithm could easily infer where to add gaps
and because of their location in the \s folder.
Yes, I need to contact Travis regarding the BFC issue
as I already did for some other ones
Maybe then "Shortcut" would be a better type of this part -
at least, it would match the filename ...c01 better.
======================================================================
At Sun Jun 13 12:25:08 2010, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
Polished header, especially changed the type to "shortcut".
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sun Jun 13 21:30:04 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: hold
Comments:
There is a gap between the ...a1.dat and ...a2.dat. You have to go close to see but then it is clearly visible. I assume rounding error.
======================================================================
At Sun Jun 13 23:00:07 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
confirmed
======================================================================
At Mon Jul 4 01:25:04 2011, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
when resubmitting, add keyword "Awning", please
======================================================================
At Wed Feb 22 00:10:02 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
reminder to self:
- when resubmitting, change title to "(Formed)"
- after some long more thinking, I think this is a part, not a shortcut, should undo the previous type change probably
|
Needs more votes. (X)