Parts Tracker :: Parts List :: Activity :: Submit :: PT Tools :: PT Reference :: LDraw Specifications :: Lookup

Unofficial File parts/15790.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

part image

File Header:

0 Propellor  3 Blade  9 Diameter with Technic Peghole
0 Name: 15790.dat
0 Author: Philippe Hurbain [Philo]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

0 !KEYWORDS propeller

Status:
Certified! (ACCCX)
Size: 717 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

MMR1988=certify
MagFors=certify
Philo=novote
Steffen=certify
arezey=novote
cwdee=certify

Required (unofficial) subfiles:

parts/s/30332s01.dat

~Propellor Blade for Propellor 3 Blade 9 Diameter

Certified! (ACCCX)

Events

Related (unofficial) files:
(none)

File reviews and updates:

At Fri Dec 6 14:20:08 2013, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: Philo
Comments:
Version discovered in latest LDD... See http://www.brickset.com/parts/search/?query=15790

======================================================================
At Fri Dec 6 15:35:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
I find the "Technic" qualifier in the title superfluous. There's no non-Technic peghole to my knowledge..?

======================================================================
At Fri Dec 6 15:55:02 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
Good point, but there is already a propellor named this way, and small system wheels have something close to a peghole but smaller. That said, I don't mind changing!

======================================================================
At Fri Dec 6 17:55:06 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: arezey
Certification: novote
Comments:
What is the distinction between a "peghole" and a "pinhole" anyway? I find the two mostly interchargable but "pinhole" is more specific about the type of hole while "peghole" seems to be more vague?

======================================================================
At Tue Dec 10 08:10:05 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: certify
Comments:
For me it is OK like it is.

======================================================================
At Wed Dec 11 22:35:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Thu Dec 26 01:30:05 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Sat Feb 8 14:50:08 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.


© 2001-2014 LDraw.org, see Legal Info for details. This website is powered by Peeron.com.

LEGO® is a registered trademark of the LEGO Group, which does not sponsor, endorse, or authorize this site. Visit the official Lego website at http://www.lego.com/.
The LDraw system is a completely unofficial, community run free CAD system which represents official parts produced by the LEGO company.
The LDraw Parts Tracker is maintained and developed by voluntary members of the LDraw organisation.