Parts Tracker :: Parts List :: Activity :: Submit :: PT Tools :: PT Reference :: LDraw Specifications :: Lookup

Unofficial File parts/14769.dat

Next File | Prev File | Download | Review | Edit | CA Header Edit | Events

part image

File Header:

0 Tile  2 x  2 Round with Round Underside Stud
0 Name: 14769.dat
0 Author: Max Martin Richter [MMR1988]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Part
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt

0 BFC CERTIFY CCW

Status:
Certified! (ACCCX)
Size: 319 bytes

Reviewers' certifications:

MMR1988=novote
MagFors=certify
Philo=novote
Steffen=certify
cwdee=certify
mikeheide=certify

Required (unofficial) subfiles:

parts/s/14769s01.dat

~Tile 2 x 2 Round with Round Underside Stud without Top Face

Certified! (ACCX)

Events

Related (unofficial) files:
(none)

File reviews and updates:

At Wed Jul 17 20:55:04 2013, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
======================================================================
At Wed Jul 17 22:10:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
I think that this part should have a softer transition from top to side surface, like the Tile 1x1 Round.
There are some, in the pictures of the new Winter Village Market, on the carousel.

======================================================================
At Thu Jul 18 04:55:01 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: novote
Comments:
Well, I tooked the photos from here:
http://www.newelementary.com/2013/07/a-neat-excision.html
And there is no difference between the old and the new version (except of the underside stud)

======================================================================
At Thu Jul 18 07:25:03 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Philo
Certification: novote
Comments:
I tend to favor the simpler version, small size of 1x1 round makes the chamfer more prominent, justifying it there.
OTOH, LDD model of 14769 does have a chamfer, 4150 one doesn't...

======================================================================
At Thu Jul 18 10:20:06 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Yes, a thin cone would be good enough. No torus.

======================================================================
At Mon Jul 22 10:40:08 2013, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Sun Feb 23 18:10:08 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Thu Nov 20 23:05:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.

======================================================================
At Fri Nov 28 20:35:00 2014 a Parts Tracker Admin edited the header.
======================================================================
At Fri Nov 28 20:35:00 2014, the following review was posted:

Reviewer: cwdee
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.


© 2001-2014 LDraw.org, see Legal Info for details. This website is powered by Peeron.com.

LEGO® is a registered trademark of the LEGO Group, which does not sponsor, endorse, or authorize this site. Visit the official Lego website at http://www.lego.com/.
The LDraw system is a completely unofficial, community run free CAD system which represents official parts produced by the LEGO company.
The LDraw Parts Tracker is maintained and developed by voluntary members of the LDraw organisation.