|
|
Unofficial File p/duplopin.dat
Next File |
Prev File |
Download |
Review |
Edit |
CA Header Edit |
Events
File Header:
0 Duplo Train Pin
0 Name: duplopin.dat
0 Author: Michael Heidemann [mikeheide]
0 !LDRAW_ORG Unofficial_Primitive
0 !LICENSE Redistributable under CCAL version 2.0 : see CAreadme.txt
0 BFC CERTIFY CCW
0 !HISTORY 2005-04-16 [mikeheide] initial version
0 !HISTORY 2009-10-24 [Steffen] BFCed
0 !HISTORY 2010-04-24 [mikeheide] Fixed intersection problems
0 !HISTORY 2013-01-13 [MMR1988] added two edges, rectified, removed overlapping quads, changed code order
0 // pin
Status:
 Needs admin review. (CCX)
Size: 2639 bytes
Reviewers' certifications:
MagFors=certify
Steffen=certify
Required (unofficial) subfiles:
(none)
Related (unofficial) files:
File reviews and updates:
At Sat Apr 16 22:10:03 2005, the file was initially submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
======================================================================
At Sat May 16 15:18:01 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
header says
"0 Unofficial Model"
======================================================================
At Sat May 16 15:44:45 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
perhaps, now "train" can also be added to filename?
======================================================================
At Fri Jun 5 13:16:02 2009, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Tue Jul 7 15:12:36 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: westrate
Certification: certify
Comments:
As "needs work" this is ok, but couldn't you fix this with isecalc?
======================================================================
At Sun Aug 30 21:00:06 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Eldar
Certification: novote
Comments:
Primitives should always use CCW winding.
======================================================================
At Sat Oct 24 18:31:11 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
BFCing this should be easy, we shouldn't have unBFCed primitives IMHO
======================================================================
At Sat Oct 24 20:38:35 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
Everybody is invited to modify if neccessary.
======================================================================
At Sat Oct 24 21:20:15 2009, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: Steffen
Comments:
BFCed
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sat Oct 24 21:20:15 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
the geometry between the straight and round portion isn't correct at all (has gaps and poke-through)
anyone wanting to correct that, go ahead
======================================================================
At Sun Oct 25 07:34:02 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
To Steffen:
As these issues are mentioned in the comments and this file has a "Needs Work" statement I think you should not hold.
======================================================================
At Sun Oct 25 13:07:28 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
Hi mike, normally I would agree to you,
but for two reasons I don't in this special case:
a) Normally, a "needs work" denotes minor glitches. But here the errors are strong: the gaps are trivially visible, the poke-through is not modeled correctly at all, and meeting edges etc. are not modeled correctly, too. This makes this file kind of a "rough sketch".
b) This is a primitive. This way it is kind of an elementary, substantial part of the LDRAW distribution. This makes it different than just a "normal" part. And being such, it should be flawless. We should not start releasing flawy primitives. This would lead to subsequent errors in all the parts using it.
======================================================================
At Sun Oct 25 14:48:06 2009, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
Agreed!
======================================================================
At Sat Apr 17 09:30:08 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: hold
Comments:
Mike, maybe using philo's tools it could be very easy
now to fix this part, so we can certify some more of your Duplo parts
======================================================================
At Sat Apr 24 09:45:04 2010, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sat Apr 24 12:25:04 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: novote
Comments:
I feel two edges missing on the underside
where the quads contact the ring section.
Here's a rough sketch line (coordinates not precise!) which points
out their place:
2 4 -8 11 -9 -4 11 -9
======================================================================
At Sat Apr 24 20:25:12 2010, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: mikeheide
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sat Apr 24 21:55:13 2010, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Mon Feb 27 00:20:03 2012, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 6 12:20:06 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MMR1988
Certification: hold
Comments:
I'm not sure if these must be edges or condlines, but nevertheless they are missing:
2 4 -4 14 -13 -8 14 -13
2 4 4 14 -13 8 14 -13
AND
in Line 40/41 is the flat primitive flipped by BFC invertnext.
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 6 12:35:01 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: novote
Comments:
you are right, those edgelines are missing.
Please update :)
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 6 15:25:16 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
Edges are added, BFC Invertnext of the disc is changed, removed the two empty comments at the end and run this prim through rectifier, too.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 6 16:20:14 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: mikeheide
Certification: certify
Comments:
Thanks! :)
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 13 09:25:02 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Many of the quads in the "stem" could be replaced by triangles, thus shrinking the filesize and would eliminate t-junctions.
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 13 12:55:05 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
I hope this is what you expected.
I also divided the code into pin and steam and used cylc and cylo to save some lines.
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 13 13:30:17 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: novote
Comments:
Very good now, but there is a "funny" typo in the comment, steam => stem.
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 13 14:00:10 2013, a new version of the file was submitted.
Submitted by: MMR1988
Comments:
And I was wondering why it was looking so strange...
Existing certification-votes were deleted.
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 13 15:25:21 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: Steffen
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
======================================================================
At Sun Jan 13 15:55:05 2013, the following review was posted:
Reviewer: MagFors
Certification: certify
No comments were posted with this review.
|
2 subfiles aren't certified. (CSSX)